I hunted down the -1 + 10 == -11 bug. I came up with a fix, but I'm not
sure how apporpriate the fix is, which is why I'm submitting it as a
patch. The problem was that in Prim.hs all the symbolic unaries were
being listed alongside the named unaries, and the unaries in the
precedence table were
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:11:05AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> I fixed it by adding a new "associativity", "spre" (symbolic prefix).
> This is for prefix things that are listed in the precedence table in
> Parser.hs.
>
> Please look over it.
It looks sane. We eventually want to regenerate the wh
I have two questions about this example code
(taken from http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/examples/sendmoremoney.p6)
(btw, a really nice example of how to use junctions - just try to write
this in perl5 :)
#!perl6
use v6;
my $s;
my $e;
my $n;
my $d;
my $m;
my $o;
my $r;
my $y;
$s = any(0..1
Hi,
quoting http://dev.perl.org/perl6/synopsis/S06.html:
> Pairs can be used as lvalues. The value of the pair is the
> recipient of the assignment:
>
> (key => $var) = "value";
>
> When binding pairs, names can be used to "match up" lvalues
> and rvalues:
>
> (who => $name, why => $rea
> "IB" == Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IB> Hi,
IB> quoting http://dev.perl.org/perl6/synopsis/S06.html:
>> Pairs can be used as lvalues. The value of the pair is the
>> recipient of the assignment:
>>
>> (key => $var) = "value";
>>
>> When binding pairs, name
Hi,
Uri Guttman stemsystems.com> writes:
> note the binding := which is not the same as =. binding is
> similar to aliasing. in the above case it matches the names
> and assigns the new values accordingly.
that makes sense. But consider:
> > "IB" == Ingo Blechschmidt web.de> writes:
> IB
On 2005-02-25, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm going to call a big, fat YAGNI on this one for the time being.
I looked that one up. :)
You Aren't Going to Need It.
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?YouArentGonnaNeedIt
I like it.
Mark
--
http://mark.stosberg.com/
Markus Laire wrote:
I have two questions about this example code
(taken from http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/examples/sendmoremoney.p6)
I have a few issues with this code. Or at least observations of how it
differs from the classic "SEND + MORE = MONEY" problem. see below.
#!perl6
use v6;
my $s;
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:40:40 +0100
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It had seemed otherwise, looking at imcc/pcc.c yesterday, but I must not
> have been looking closely enough. Is
Is there any good way to temporarily suspend or, even better, take
control of a Test::Builder testing session?
The reason I ask is because I am working on a specification-based
testing system for Perl that utilizes random-testing methods in which
a single property check can involve thousands of ran
Ingo Blechschmidt writes:
> that's really convenient, but what will the following code do?
> my $x = (a => 42); # $x is a Pair.
> $x = 13; # Is $x now the Pair (a => 13) or
> # the Int 13?
It's the Int 13. Your example looks a lot like this one:
m
Look at Test::Tester, it hijacks the Test::Builder object and replaces with
another that sometimes delegates to the real Test::Builder object and other
times delegates to a custom Test::Builder object that just collects results
without outputting anything or affecting the "real" test results.
You
12 matches
Mail list logo
