Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> in the near, or far, future there will be test scripts and compiler
> input in PIR. For that it would be nice, if long text doesn't have to
> be crammed into a single line.
> So some kind of HERE document syntax is needed for PIR. Suggesti
Cory Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is is possible to check to see whether an attribute exists on a given
> object, or at least catch an exception if it doesn't? I've tried to set
> up an exception handler, but Parrot exits without anything being caught.
Not yet. C throws currently an unca
MrJoltCola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel that this feature is for higher level languages.
[ snip ]
> ... PIR is for compilers, not people,
PIR is foremost Parrot's primary assembly language. If it were for
compiles only, it wouldn't have needed "a = b + c" in the first place,
the "add" op
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm still waiting for confirmation that the recipe below works for
ppc-linux.
Thanks,
leo
>> jitcapable=1, jitarchname=ppc-linux,
> I've now tried to fix that too long lasting problem.
> 1) attach the patch below
> 2) mv config/gen/platform/darwi
MrJoltCola wrote:
> This should actually be titled "Where are all the compilers?"
The compilers will come! Loads of people, myself included, are quietly
working away on compilers that target IMC.
It takes time for people to discover and adopt new platforms -
especially when you are so modest abou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael G Schwern) writes:
[...]
> More to the point is its completely unstructured output that comes not
> as part of the test but between them.
It might be worthwhile to associate that "unstructured output" with
a particular test (either the previous "ok/not ok" line, or th
At 03:21 AM 2/25/2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
MrJoltCola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel that this feature is for higher level languages.
[ snip ]
> ... PIR is for compilers, not people,
PIR is foremost Parrot's primary assembly language. If it were for
compiles only, it wouldn't have needed "a
MrJoltCola wrote:
At 03:21 AM 2/25/2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
MrJoltCola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel that this feature is for higher level languages.
[ snip ]
> ... PIR is for compilers, not people,
My impression was that the target for compilers should be a yet
non-existent abstract syn
Hi,
I just came across Parrot the other day, so some of you might think I
may have been living under a rock for a little while (and you might not
be so wrong either - lol), so please excuse me if I am way out in left
field on this topic, but I have a slightly upside down interest in
Parrot asm
At 11:48 AM 2/25/2005, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
MrJoltCola wrote:
At 03:21 AM 2/25/2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
MrJoltCola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel that this feature is for higher level languages.
[ snip ]
> ... PIR is for compilers, not people,
My impression was that the target for c
Hello,
I've been developing a compiler that will target Parrot for the last
couple of months. I have a question.
I've only been reading the list for a short time (1 - 1 1/2 months). I
was reading some of the past articles, but there's just so many of
them that I figure I might as well just ask the
At 12:57 PM 2/25/2005, Steve Coleman wrote:
constructs that could not be logically mapped from other CPU's into
Parrot? Does Parrot assume/use many high level constructs not found in
real processors? Some CPU translations, like from CISC to RISC, are
clearly easier than the reverse, but other t
At 01:27 PM 2/25/2005, vlad florentino wrote:
Is there now, or will there be in the future, any way to call C/C++
library routines from within Parrot? For example, a mysql, pcre or
libcurl library. Either static or dynamic.
C yes. C shares objects are dynamically loadable by Parrot.
C++? Not direct
Stéphane Payrard wrote:
# set? I don't think so.
my $a, $b, $c set 1..3 ; # alphabetic like and, or, xor?
# and what precedence relative to them?
well, I'm not sure the feature is good, but I have some idea about the
sign that could be used for this :-)
we have
-- Forwarded message --
From: vlad florentino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:56:33 -0500
Subject: Re: Calling C/C++ library routines
To: MrJoltCola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:40:15 -0500, MrJoltCola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 01:27 PM 2/25/2005,
http://cvs.perl.org/viewcvs/cvs-public/parrot/examples/pni/
has examples for QT, sdl, and the win32 API.
Regards.
vlad florentino writes:
Wow, that's great!
Are there any examples showing how one can call C routines in Parrot?
$vlad.f()
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 14:18 -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> http://cvs.perl.org/viewcvs/cvs-public/parrot/examples/pni/
>
> has examples for QT, sdl, and the win32 API.
The actual NCI stuff (for SDL bindings, at least) is in:
http://cvs.perl.org/viewcvs/cvs-public/parrot/runtime/parrot/library/
Melvin wrote:
>
> Parrot need's its own version of "C" or "C#" to empower more people
> to contribute. If every new feature for Parrot is thought of in
> terms of PIR & IMCC, then IMCC will just become more of a tangled
> mess that nobody wants to touch, and high-level development will
> continue
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 12:31 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I'm still waiting for confirmation that the recipe below works for
> ppc-linux.
Nope, the assembler here doesn't understand the code. Here's what
worked for me.
-- c
#define PPC_JIT_GP_REGISTER_SAVE_SPACE (4*19)
;; This macro would
Greetings. Sorry for the cross-posting; the subsequent Apocrypha
installments will appear on perl6-compiler only. But since this one
deal with the relationship between Pugs and the existing Perl5/Perl6
projects, I thought it may help to cross-post this announcement.
The full text of PA01 is avai
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 13:18 -0800, chromatic wrote:
> Nope, the assembler here doesn't understand the code. Here's what
> worked for me.
Ignore that attachment, it's wrong. Here's the right one.
-- c
.text
.align 12
.globl Parrot_ppc_jit_restore_nonvolatile_reg
MrJoltCola wrote:
I doubt there is much that could not be mapped to Parrot, but Parrot
does things that would be impossible to map directly back to a CPU.
Currently I am only thinking of just a CPU X to Parrot asm translation,
not the reverse, and this is just an attempt to get to a consolidated
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:22:33AM -0500, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > More to the point is its completely unstructured output that comes not
> > as part of the test but between them.
>
> It might be worthwhile to associate that "unstructured output" with
> a particular test (either the previous "ok/n
23 matches
Mail list logo
