Leif Eriksen wrote:
I'd guess it is because you are seeing the output of the code after it
has been compiled-then-decompiled - it is compiled so it can run and
coverage statistics can be collected, then it is decompiled to relate
coverage stats to code lines. Now there are many ways to write cod
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 08:09:58PM -0500, Jim Keenan wrote:
> Leif Eriksen wrote:
> >I'd guess it is because you are seeing the output of the code after it
> >has been compiled-then-decompiled - it is compiled so it can run and
> >coverage statistics can be collected, then it is decompiled to re
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:12:16AM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I suppose that's the price you pay for TIMTOWTDI.
>
> [ Is that a Python programmer I hear giggling in the background? ]
Does Python have any equivalent tool to Devel::Cover?
Nicholas Clark
Will Coleda via RT wrote:
According to our records, your request regarding
"[BUG] missing Makefile dependencies"
has been resolved.
No, isn't resolved. At least there isn't any rule, which changes need
which level of "make *clean". Changes to classes/* comes to my mind.
leo
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> WRT functionality: for a call it has to shift up PMC arguments and
>> insert the object as P5, right?
> At the moment, it contains this logic. My plans are to remove the
> shifting and set the object into P2 / INTERP->ctx.current_ob
# New Ticket Created by FranÃois PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #34002]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34002 >
All instances of ParrotIOLayerAPI could be declared as 'const' in the IO
subsystem
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[ provide Bound_Meth core PMC classes ]
> Cool. I'd likely still subclass it to provide a get_string.
Yep.
>> WRT implementation: I'd like to swap struct_val/pmc_val for all Sub
>> classes. It's just cleaner but should be almost full
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:02:16 -0800, via RT Matt Diephouse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
> # Please include the string: [perl #33171]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=33
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
WRT functionality: for a call it has to shift up PMC arguments and
insert the object as P5, right?
At the moment, it contains this logic. My plans are to remove the
shifting and set the object into P2 / INTERP->ctx
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> ... But that doesn't
>> work fur user methods, especially if there is no indication that a user
>> function is used as a method in the first place.
>>
>> def find(s, sub):
>> ...
> In Python, this is statically determinable. I
I've just noticed that the perl-qa wiki linked from http://qa.perl.org/
is still toast.
I seem to remember somebody (Andy ?) saying that a
something-or-other.kwiki.org was in the process of being set up to
replace it. Is my terrible memory playing it's usual tricks or has it
popped into existe
http://phalanx.kwiki.org/
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:51:22 +, Adrian Howard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just noticed that the perl-qa wiki linked from http://qa.perl.org/
> is still toast.
>
> I seem to remember somebody (Andy ?) saying that a
> something-or-other.kwiki.org was in the proc
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:10:41PM -0600, Shawn Carroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> http://phalanx.kwiki.org/
>
Yeah, but the one Schwern had goin' was more general.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
My impression was that was for Phalanx people, rather than perl-qa in
general ?
Adrian
On 31 Jan 2005, at 18:10, Shawn Carroll wrote:
http://phalanx.kwiki.org/
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:51:22 +, Adrian Howard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just noticed that the perl-qa wiki linked from
http://
I misread the question. Sorry about that.
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:07:51 +, Adrian Howard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My impression was that was for Phalanx people, rather than perl-qa in
> general ?
>
> Adrian
>
> On 31 Jan 2005, at 18:10, Shawn Carroll wrote:
>
> > http://phalanx.kwiki.o
> The recent gdbmhash configure check causes the following output on my
> system during the build.
I have changed dynclasses.in to use the CONDITIONED_LINE hack. So there
is no longer a need to access a potentially undefined config value.
A patch is attached.
> runtime/parrot/include...
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:51:22PM +, Adrian Howard wrote:
> I've just noticed that the perl-qa wiki linked from http://qa.perl.org/
> is still toast.
Basically I accidentally deleted the CGI program and since it was one of
those "everything, including the config, in one file" things I haven'
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 04:07:04PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> So I may as well do that now.
Done. Let me know if that seems like its the right database, there were
several to choose from owing to circumstances.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Python have customizable test suites *at all*?
I dont know about that, but I hear they have the ability to invoke the
debugger from within the code, rather than the other way round like
perl/C/... does
Something like
import pdb
...
pdb.run(statement_to_debug[, g
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:00:40 +, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:12:16AM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > I suppose that's the price you pay for TIMTOWTDI.
> >
> > [ Is that a Python programmer I hear giggling in the background? ]
>
> Does Python have any
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:21:44PM -0500, Randy W. Sims wrote:
> Randy W. Sims wrote:
> >The test file below is pared down from Module::Build. The warning from
> >C comes up in several tests, not always causing test failures.
> >The same warning appears if you run MakeMaker as shown in the
> >D
Hi. This is just a quick heads-up that today I'm beginning to work on
Pugs, with the hope that it may become a full Perl6 interpreter some day:
http://autrijus.org/pugs/
Although Pugs does not yet directly relate to PGE or Parrot, I do hope
that it can flesh out corner cases in the Synopses
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-01-18 through 2005-01-31
All~
Welcome to another double feature summary. Sadly, this one was delayed
because of an argument that I was/am having with my connection.
Fortunately, a generous neighbor has allowed me to use his connection
for the time being.
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>
>> Not quite. It's just:
>>
>> f = getattribute Parrot_string, "find"
>>
>> nothing more. The C vtable has to do the right thing, i.e.
>> if the attribute is a callable, it has to return a bound method object.
> Exactly.
[ I've che
S09 states (in "Parallelized parameters and autothreading") that if you
use a parameter as an array subscript in a closure, the closure is a
candidate for autothreading.
-> $x, $y { @foo[$x;$y] }
Means:
-> ?$x = @foo.shape[0].range,
?$y = @foo.shape[1].range { @foo[$x;$y] }
And e
Quoth Luke Palmer on Monday 31 January 2005 03:46 pm,
> C_{ijkl} = A_{ij} * B_{kl}
>
> You write either of:
>
> Â @C[$^i; $^j; $^k; $^l] = @A[$^i; $^j] * @B[$^k; $^l] Â
> @C = Â @A[$^i; $^j] * @B[$^k; $^l] Â
Hmm... This is both insanely great and also greatly insane.
The issue is th
Luke Palmer writes:
> Or to write another typical tensor product:
>
> a^j = L_i^j b^i
>
> You write either of:
>
> Â @a[$^j] = @L[$^i; $^j] * @b[$^i] Â
> @a = @L Â*Â @b;
Or not. There's that implicit Einstein summation involved, and a
general purpose programming language isn't abou
Craig DeForest writes:
> Quoth Luke Palmer on Monday 31 January 2005 03:46 pm,
> > C_{ijkl} = A_{ij} * B_{kl}
> >
> > You write either of:
> >
> > Â @C[$^i; $^j; $^k; $^l] = @A[$^i; $^j] * @B[$^k; $^l] Â
> > @C = Â @A[$^i; $^j] * @B[$^k; $^l] Â
>
> Hmm... This is both insanely great an
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:48:22 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any reason to keep lib/Make.pm around?
>
> No, AFAIK.
Since no one has said anything to the contrary, would someone remove
it? Then I'll close the appropriate ti
29 matches
Mail list logo
