Bernhard Schmalhofer (via RT) wrote:
I have been going over 'build_nativecall.pl', 'call_list.txt' and
'nci_test.c'.
Thanks, applied.
leo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Thursday 27 January 2005 00:50, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 06:28:20PM -0500, David Golden wrote:
> > But is there any reason they can't be run in the same process?
>
> In general I think its a bad idea for the test and the thing
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 05:48:15PM +0100, Tels wrote:
> If I understand the current test model correctly, the seperation also has
> the advantage that if the test dies, the parser is largely unaffected. It
> even tells you *where* it died (e.g. "after test #7"). If you have
> test/parser in one
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #33962]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=33962 >
The readline opcode returns too many lines. Compare the following pir
with `wc -l`.
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #33963]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=33963 >
harmony:~/Projects/parrot ezekiel$ cat test.pir
.sub main @MAIN
$P0 = open "tes
