mAsterdam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately the uppercased literals yield 0 instead of 42.
Is already fixed in CVS.
leo
Mattia Barbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> crrently argument count is passed in I3. A comment in untils.c
> near foldup says that:
> TODO - IMCC and PDD 3 aren't yet in conformance.
The TODO is obsolete. IMCC is fixed (at least until it comes to overflow
which isn't handled everywh
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am experimenting with registering my own compiler for the "regex"
> language, but the usage is confusing. It seems that the intention is
> that compilers will return a code object that gets invoked, at which
> time it runs until it hits an C opcode. But wha
Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still, tables are useful, so here's a simple way to get the kind of
> table we see above, without the HTMLish trap of pseudo-layout:
>
> Because one of the features of POD is that documentation tends to be
> readable in markup form, an C<=>-introduced mar
Mattia Barbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> as promised with this patch:
> pmc2c2 ... --library foo --c pmc1.pmc pmc2.pmc pmc3.pmc ...
Thanks, applied, and #31269 too.
> Nag: the dynext patch from the other week is still unapplied: is
> there any problem with it or did it just fa
--Boundary-00=_4qIKBAMkjo+ZGFc
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Moin,
this is something that I had a long time sitting on my harddisk. I uploaded
v0.10 to
http://bloodgate.com/perl/packages/BigBench-0.10.tar.gz
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Sunday 22 August 2004 13:58, Tels wrote:
> "Und jetzt kommen Sie!" - Stenkelfeld
>
>
> - -Boundary-00=_4qIKBAMkjo+ZGFc
> Content-Type: application/x-perl;
Ugh, seems the gnupg signing screwed up the mime containers or something
like that: I apologize
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 19:36:43 -0400 Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 6:44 PM +0200 8/21/04, Mattia Barbon wrote:
> > Hello,
> >I think extenders should have access to at least some of the
> >flags in PObj_enum. Should we have a different function for
> >each flag (say: Parrot_PObj_set
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 11:00:10 +0200 Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattia Barbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > as promised with this patch:
>
> > pmc2c2 ... --library foo --c pmc1.pmc pmc2.pmc pmc3.pmc ...
>
> Thanks, applied, and #31269 too.
Thanks!
> > Nag:
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Still, tables are useful, so here's a simple way to get the kind of
table we see above, without the HTMLish trap of pseudo-layout:
Because one of the features of POD is that documentation tends to be
readable in markup form
Sorry if this has already been asked and answered, but in doing a little research
about Perl 6
mixins (http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=384858), I ran into some questions
that I
couldn't figure from either A12 or "Perl 6 and Parrot Essentials."
First, how does one access the instance in
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 08:04:48AM -0700, Ovid wrote:
: Sorry if this has already been asked and answered, but in doing a little research
about Perl 6
: mixins (http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=384858), I ran into some questions
that I
: couldn't figure from either A12 or "Perl 6 and Par
At 4:00 PM +0200 8/22/04, Mattia Barbon wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 19:36:43 -0400 Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 6:44 PM +0200 8/21/04, Mattia Barbon wrote:
> Hello,
>I think extenders should have access to at least some of the
>flags in PObj_enum. Should we have a different funct
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 01:21:33PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> [ segfaulting example ]
> >g_signal_connect_object (G_OBJECT (button), "clicked",
> > G_CALLBACK (hello), NULL, 0);
>
> Are you sure, that these two G_foo() aren't doing something with the
> function a
At 4:05 PM +0200 8/22/04, Mattia Barbon wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 11:00:10 +0200 Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattia Barbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nag: the dynext patch from the other week is still unapplied: is
> there any problem with it or did it just fall through the
And as I look at the code for that test:
output_is(<< 'CODE', << 'OUTPUT', "Getting PMCs from string;int compound keys");
new P0, .PerlHash
new P1, .PerlHash
new P2, .PerlInt
set P2, 4
set P1[9], P2
set I0, P1[9]
print I0
print "\n"
set P0["a"], P1
set I0, P
Hi!
(crossposted from use.perl.org, http://use.perl.org/~domm/journal/20508)
As our kids where with their grandparents today and nothing else (cleaning
up etc) was todo, I used my tuits to work on CPANTS.
The results are a new version on CPAN (should arrive at your CPAN
mirror/search.cpan.org so
Larry wrote:
You can also create your own anonymous class at run time that incorporates
both roles simultaneously and disambiguates them.
Or, presumably, you could use an anonymous role directly:
$driver does role {
does SanitationEngineer;
does RaceCarDriver;
method dri
Matt and Steve's postings about their Parrot related blogs triggered me
to create 'Planet Parrot' -> http://planet.parrotcode.org
It's an aggregator of:
Matt
chromatic
Dan Suglaski
It only has a link to Steve's blog right now, because he doesn't provide
RSS. (The downsid
Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been adding tests for the op 'does' in most of the PMC test files.
Thanks, applied.
leo
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #31292]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31292 >
Hi there,
This test case and patch demonstrates and fixes a problem where *Structs
shar
21 matches
Mail list logo
