Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * there is no opcode to use it, e.g.:
>Pio = backtick Scmd, Pargv, Iflags
I've now integrated that into the C opcode:
.local pmc pipe
pipe = open "/bin/cat -n", "|-"
# or
pipe = open "/bin/ls -l", "-|"
There is still no good way to pass
# New Ticket Created by Jens Rieks
# Please include the string: [perl #30084]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30084 >
Hi,
the BASIC compiler (languages/BASIC/compiler/) does not work. The runtime
files a
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * there is no opcode to use it, e.g.:
>
> >Pio = backtick Scmd, Pargv, Iflags
>
> I've now integrated that into the C opcode:
>
> .local pmc pipe
> pipe = open "/bin/cat -n", "|-"
>
> # or
>
> p
"Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> > Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * there is no opcode to use it, e.g.:
> >
> > >Pio = backtick Scmd, Pargv, Iflags
> >
> > I've now integrated that into the C opcode:
> >
> > .local pm
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >
> > > Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > * there is no opcode to use it, e.g.:
> > >
> > > >Pio = backtick Scmd, Pargv, Iflags
> > >
>
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> 6. ICU won't build with Sun's cc. If I move gcc out of the way so
> ICU's configure can't find it, then the compilation fails on
> classes/null.c with the following error messages:
>
> perl classes/pmc2c2.pl --c --no-lines classes/null.pmc
> "c
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 4. ICU
>
> Is there a precompiled version of ICU for your arch? You'd need the
> headers and the libs. Configure has 2 options to use precompiled ICU.
Oh, there probably is for Solaris, but there probably
Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Then lets add:
backtick Pfilehandle, Scommand, Imode
backtick Pfilehandle, Scommand, Imode, Pargarray
to the ops list.
Might there be a better name for this op? I know backtick isn't just
Perl-ish; it's used in UNIX shells to
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Just use a Key PMC for $P2.
>
>> So, just for fun I added the following test to t/pmc/perlhash.t:
>
>> new P10, .PerlHash
>> new P1, .PerlString
>>
Hi,
what has to be done to get parrot running with cygwin? For me, linking failes
with:
blib/lib/libicuuc.a(udata.o)(.text+0xe36): In function `openCommonData':
/home/egal/parrot/icu/source/common/udata.c:581: undefined reference to
`__imp__icudt26_dat'
I saw some messages about this some time
--- Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what has to be done to get parrot running with
> cygwin? For me, linking failes
> with:
>
> blib/lib/libicuuc.a(udata.o)(.text+0xe36): In
> function `openCommonData':
> /home/egal/parrot/icu/source/common/udata.c:581:
> undefined reference to
>
> Before I get too deep into an implementation, I'd like to poll the group about
> how you would use this feature and like it to behave. My thoughts and plans follow.
>
> For the coverage summary, the numbers represent actual coverage, but the colors
> are based upon actual coverage + analysis. S
The Perl 6 Summary for the fortnight ending 2004-06-06
Whee! There's a new graphics card in the G5, which means I can type this
at the big screen again, which makes me happy. Well, it would make me
far happier if the new card didn't leave horrible artifacts all over the
screen like
Hi!
On Monday 07 June 2004, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> --- Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what has to be done to get parrot running with
> > cygwin? For me, linking failes
> > with:
> >
> > blib/lib/libicuuc.a(udata.o)(.text+0xe36): In
> > function `openCommonData':
> > /home/e
--- Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> System ICU? Not tried yet, thank you for the tip!
I built from the source. FYI:
0. link => 'c++' in config/init/hints/cygwin.pl
1. http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/
2. Ensure that the .dlls are executable
3. Ensure that the location of the .dlls are
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 04:21:14PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Since you've added ? and ? to the list above, I'll add them as well:
What's so hard to type about the question mark? And what's so
significant that you added it twice?
OK, so I know that you really meant to type and
.
This is wha
On 2004-06-07 at 21:33:03, David Cantrell wrote:
> This is what is so wrong about allowing unicode operators - yes, I don't
> need to write them, but if some other programmer writes one I have to be
> able to read it. And I can't.
Well, for one thing, just because your email program doesn't let
Guys,
Although my wife is totally underwhelmed by this, here's a nice SDL
demo. It needs some more work, but I won't get time to visit it again in
the next week.
The backface culling isn't perfect, but you get the idea,
Cheers,
Nick
p.s. If you don't have enough memory to run this, try removing
One thing I forgot to mention, you'll need to download the latest SDL
library from Chromatic's web page:
http://wgz.org/chromatic/parrot/sdl/
Cheers,
Nick
Don't know what happened to my second attachment. This isn't going well.
Nick
Nick Glencross wrote:
Don't know what happened to my second attachment. This isn't going well.
Nick
Very strange, something is consuming my attachment. Let's have one final
try with it gzipped.
Nick
teapot.dat.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Mark J. Reed wrote:
On 2004-06-07 at 21:33:03, David Cantrell wrote:
This is what is so wrong about allowing unicode operators - yes, I don't
need to write them, but if some other programmer writes one I have to be
able to read it. And I can't.
Well, for one thing, just because your email program
On 6/7/2004 11:26 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>> The only thing I don't like about this approach is that some of the data is
>> available only in the tooltips, which of course don't print.
>
> sorry I need this kind of explanation, but what are the tooltips?
When you hover the mouse over one of
When you hover the mouse over one of the percentages, you get a little
pop-up
that gives the numbers used to calculate the percentage. ("Tooltip"
probably
isn't the right name for this situation, but that's what I'm used to
calling them.)
The "ALT attribute as tooltip" thing isn't portable, thou
On 6/7/2004 9:20 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
>
> The "ALT attribute as tooltip" thing isn't portable, though.
I don't use ALT, I use TITLE. That's the "right way" according to the W3C and
supported by at least IE and Mozilla-based browsers. Or did you mean something
else by "isn't portable?"
-mjc
> Yeah, good point. pipeopen maybe? (Though then that gets confused with
> regular pipes) childproc? If it weren't so darned fundamental to the
> languages we care about I'd just throw the thing into the standard library
> and punt on it entirely...
It seems like an example of opcode bloat to me.
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
"PIO_unix_pipe()"
Leo's implemented a "PIO_unix_pipe()" method which allows you to run an
external program and capture the results with a Parrot IO handle. He
doctored the "open" opcode to use it
pipe = open "/bin/ls -l", "-|"
While that's right r
27 matches
Mail list logo
