On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 08:17 pm, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:38:03PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
[snip]
You could allow extensions at any time but then you lose the ability
to know
if you ran 4 + 2 tests or 5 + 1,
Not if you introduce an end tag (though I'd rather
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 11:50 pm, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:19:35PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
[snip]
Also you can allocate a sub block to each thread and you don't have
to worry
about it's output getting confused with the output of any other thread
because ever
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ snip ]
> * const_string_from_cstring - return cached constant string or create one
> * const_key_new_cstring - return cached PMC or create a constant PMC
Some more thoughts WRT this issue:
- PerlHash isn't suitable for storing/lookup these STRINGs/Key
Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> this is only useful if a hashlookup is fast compared with
>> string_make.
>
> Well, it might be. Hashing can be quite fast, ya know.
>
> Here's a better idea, one you'll have more difficulty arguing with --
> imagine a debugger, written in parrot.
>
Dear fellow hackers,
First of all, I would like to say that I hope that you dont take
offence at my silly questions and crazy ideas! ;)
I have been looking in the amazing work that you have been doing with
parrot and the work that Michal Wallace has been doing with the Pirate,
the following quest
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20030824
Another week, another Perl 6 summary. I'm running late writing this and
I don't care because I spent the bank holiday weekend at a folk festival
and didn't get back 'til Monday evening.
Predictably enough, we'll start with the shenani
James Michael Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear fellow hackers,
> First of all, I would like to say that I hope that you dont take
> offence at my silly questions and crazy ideas! ;)
There are no silly questions, only silly answers and crazy ideas are the
motor of development - trying to a
Juergen Boemmels wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrotes:
>
> > We currently have constant Key and Sub PMCs both created from the
> > packfile at load time. They live in the constant_table pointing to a
> > constant PMC pool. But we need more.
> >
> > We have allover the core code like this:
> >
> >st
