mrnobo1024 sent the following bits through the ether:
> Parrot_sprintf isn't recognizing 7 as a number in the precision field, so
> trying to use that results in a "'7' is not a valid sprintf format" error.
Thanks, patch applied.
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astra
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Attached is a test program, showing an implementations for multiple
> timers. GNU/linux only, but implementing the platform interface (and the
> sighandler/message queue) shouldn't be too hard.
don't know if it's worth something, but this is how your timer program
could
At 4:23 PM -0700 7/15/03, Tupshin Harper wrote:
Piers Cawley wrote:
Targeting Parrot from GCC
Discussion in the thread entitled 'WxWindows Support / Interfacing
Libraries' centred on writing a Parrot backend to GCC. (No, I have no
idea what that has to do with the thread subject.) Tupshi
I have issues with this patch.
Leopold Toetsch:
# PIO_eprintf can fallback to vfprintf(3), when no
# interpreter is supplied, which means that we should have compatible
# format chars for basic data types.
First of all, spf_render.c:18-20:
/* Per Dan's orders, we will not use sprintf if s
On 07/16/03 Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >> pit/pratfalls. At one point, Tupshin suggested emulating a 'more
> >> traditional stack-oriented processor' and I don't think he was
> >> joking...
> >>
> >Indeed, I wasn't, but I wish somebody would at least have the
> >decency to tell me how insane this
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 4:23 PM -0700 7/15/03, Tupshin Harper wrote:
Piers Cawley wrote:
Targeting Parrot from GCC
Discussion in the thread entitled 'WxWindows Support / Interfacing
Libraries' centred on writing a Parrot backend to GCC. (No, I
have no
idea what that has to do with the
I'm getting into testing a lot more lately and I realize that Test::More
doesn't do what I would like it to do and thus I'm creating my own test
class. I took the code from Test::More namely the _export_to_level(),
plan(), import(), and builder(). I know what builder is doing so I don't
need any
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 07:28 AM, Potozniak, Andrew wrote:
I'm getting into testing a lot more lately and I realize that
Test::More
doesn't do what I would like it to do and thus I'm creating my own test
class.
If your new module uses Test::Builder, you can use it and Test::More
together
Paolo Molaro wrote:
Traditional processors aren't stack-oriented, not even ones that are
more register-starved than the x86 family. (I'm thinking of the 6502
with it's 1.75 registers here)
The wording "stack-oriented processor" is a little misleading, since it
usually means the processor has
Found this pecularity in config/inter/progs.pl.
The lines should probably just be removed (as well as lex/bison in
@args and elsewhere), since $yacc/$lex are specifically handled above,
but I wasn't sure what the intended purpose was.
Anyway, giving --lex or --yacc arguments to Configure.pl wil
Brent Dax wrote:
I have issues with this patch.
Leopold Toetsch:
# PIO_eprintf can fallback to vfprintf(3), when no
# interpreter is supplied, which means that we should have compatible
# format chars for basic data types.
First of all, spf_render.c:18-20:
/* Per Dan's orders, we will not
Aldo Calpini wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Attached is a test program, showing an implementations for multiple
timers. GNU/linux only, but implementing the platform interface (and the
sighandler/message queue) shouldn't be too hard.
don't know if it's worth something, but this is how your time
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 01:36 AM, Aldo Calpini wrote:
sorry to reiterate the argument, but will also a text transcript of
the talk be posted online? the slides are beautiful, but without a few
words of explanation they are "scary" at least :-)
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2003/07/16/soto2003.h
Dan,
I've been playing about with the new object stuff you added today, and
I've noticed a couple of problems.
Firstly, when your doing the initialization for a new ParrotClass PMC,
you create an Array to hold various other PMCs, but you don't size the
array; this means that when you later
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi Piers,
>
> Before you're deluged...
>
>> What's Ponie? Ponie is 'Perl On New Internal Architecture'
>
> Err, no, because then it would have been Ponia (presumably the singular
> feminine). The project is definitely Ponie (the neuter plural).
>
> And, for the record,
15 matches
Mail list logo
