Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to:
>mark roots from interpreter
>follow marked but previously unfollowed pmcs
>mark pmcs on system stack
>follow marked but previously unfollowed pmcs
> But considering the potential benefit for debugging, it might be worth
> it.
Th
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, do these work well as pmcs, or should it be integrated with
> PerlArray (I hope not)?
It should subclass PerlArray. I think you don't need LazySequence. You
can just set the exceptions to the lazy sequence in the PerlArray
subclass.
Array/PerlArray
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pads shouldn't really be stacks, they should be plain linked lists.
A plain linked list is lacking the chunk allocation scheme. I'm not sure
if allocating a buffer_like and Parrot_allocate the memory for the pads
is better, then the current stack based im
Leon Brocard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the bug report. I've patched parrot in CVS to use perldoc
> -U.
Unknown option: U
perldoc [options] PageName|ModuleName|ProgramName...
(perldoc is very likely from 5.005; version 1.14)
leo
Leopold Toetsch sent the following bits through the ether:
> Unknown option: U
> perldoc [options] PageName|ModuleName|ProgramName...
>
> (perldoc is very likely from 5.005; version 1.14)
I was a little hasty with the previous patch, sorry. I blame perldoc's
man page for not sorting options alph
At 9:13 AM +0200 7/2/03, K Stol wrote:
In Perl this is possible (because of the syntax of Perl). But what
about languages in which it cannot be expressed?
I know, Parrot is mainly for Perl, but not *only* for Perl. Wouldn't
it be nice to have Parrot supporting this?
Yup, it would. Parrot's assumi
At 7:08 AM -0700 7/4/03, David wrote:
There was a recent mention on the wxWindows* list that pairing it with Parrot
would be a good combination. Is there any interest in supporting wxWindows in
Parrot?
On the one hand, I don't particularly care to bless a windowing
toolkit, since they all have cro
Will it be possible (or sane even) to bind a variable to an array slice
e.g
## correct syntax?
my @array = << a list of values >>;
my @array_slice := @array[ 1 .. @array.end ];
Or would this merely bind @array_slice to the list returned by the slice,
or would it DTRT (in my eyes at least)
> Will it be possible (or sane even) to bind a variable to an array slice
> e.g
>
> ## correct syntax?
> my @array = << a list of values >>;
>
> my @array_slice := @array[ 1 .. @array.end ];
Yeah, that'll work. It has to, lest:
my [EMAIL PROTECTED] := (1, 1, map { $^a + $^b } zip(@fi
I alread did ask some time ago:
Is there any compelling reason that *_keyed_int vtables like:
PMC* get_pmc_keyed_int (INTVAL* key)
take a pointer to the key?
This needs then (in all ops files, incl JIT):
INTVAL key = $3;
$1 = $2->vtable->get_pmc_keyed_int(interpreter, $2, &key);
(setting up
Dan Brook wrote:
Will it be possible (or sane even) to bind a variable to an array slice
It *should* be, since it's possible (if ungainly) to do it in Perl 5:
use Data::Dumper 'Dumper';
@bar = (1,2,3);
*foo = (sub [EMAIL PROTECTED])->(@bar[1,0,3]);
print Dumper [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Actually, I was the one mentioning it in a completely offhand remark
in some discussion about the future of wxWindows ;-).
I'm not looking for official endorsement of wxWindows as "the"
GUI toolkit for Parrot -- TIMTOWTDI -- but it sure would be sweet to
have, and definitely would not hurt Parrot-b
Whoops. Needed to go to the list as well.
> Original Message-
> From: "Clinton Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, Jul-4-2003 4:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Parrot is feature-frozen until Wednesday
>
> > It crashes rather b
# New Ticket Created by "Clinton A. Pierce"
# Please include the string: [perl #22877]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=22877 >
This bug did not make itself known in a 6/23 checkout, and appeared sometime in t
GUI toolkit for Parrot -- TIMTOWTDI -- but it sure would be sweet to
have, and definitely would not hurt Parrot-based application
Whoops. Just to clarify: It would be sweet to have an interface for
wxWindows in Parrot -- not the official endorsement.
And let me try to formulate a nice and clear que
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "K Stol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Gordon Henriksen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: Tentative [PATCH]: valclone
> At 9:13 AM +0200 7/2/03, K Stol wrote:
> >In Perl t
Christian Renz wrote:
What is the easiest way to make a monster like wxWindows (in terms of
classes) available for Parrot?
The easiest way isn't avaialble yet. That is custom dynamically loaded
PMCs (classes) representing some functionality. Alreay working is the
NCI (Native call interface) to
Clinton A. Pierce (via RT) wrote:
I don't have a small test case for this.
Please read some threads about IO & such after my post:
Subject: Timely destruction and TRACE_SYSTEM_AREAS
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:59:18 +0200
If your are sure, that you are on a different kind of bug, then I'll
have
K Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> This, of course, brings up the question of who gets to decide whether
>> things are passed by value or reference, the caller or callee, so I'm
>> up for discussion on that.
> The calle
> > I don't have a small test case for this.
>
> Please read some threads about IO & such after my post:
>
> Subject: Timely destruction and TRACE_SYSTEM_AREAS
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:59:18 +0200
>
> If your are sure, that you are on a different kind of bug, then I'll
> have a closer look
Iain Truskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Jonadab the Unsightly One ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01 Jul 2003 23:41]:
> > Iain Truskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Not the only one. And with Parrot being able to execute
> > > Z-code, it might be sane to port Inform to Parrot!
>
> > Did you me
On Friday, July 4, 2003, at 10:56 , Dan Sugalski wrote:
This, of course, brings up the question of who gets to decide whether
things are passed by value or reference, the caller or callee, so I'm
up for discussion on that.
Isn't this again a function of the routine's signature? The callee ought
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Damian Conway wrote:
> > Will it be possible (or sane even) to bind a variable to an array slice
> It *should* be, since it's possible (if ungainly) to do it in Perl 5:
Ouch, blatant abuse of perl5's aliasing with @_ and globs ;) Can I also
assume that you can also pass around
23 matches
Mail list logo
