Type Conversion Matrix, Pragmas (TAKE 4)

2003-06-10 Thread Michael Lazzaro
Seeing as how lots of folks are on the road, and you can hear the on-list crickets chirping, I'm not sure if anything can be accomplished, but I'll repost this as one of those perennial things-which-really-need-to-be-decided-because-lots-of-stuff-is- dependant-on-it-in-terms-of-basic-A2-exam

making а russian network resources about the parrot

2003-06-10 Thread Nick Kostirya
Hello, I intend to create a russian network resource about the parrot. I am looking for people with similar intentions not to do this work twice. I would also like to know Are you going to put the documentation in different languages to the repository? Nick. Sorry to trouble you if I was mistaken

Re: Current CVS broken?

2003-06-10 Thread Paul Fisher
Brian Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any thoughts? Are you running RHL 9? If so, unset LANG and try rebuilding. Default RHL 9 w/ LANG="en_US.UTF-8": $ make jit_cpu.c /usr/bin/perl jit2h.pl i386 jit_cpu.c jit2h: 1 (+ 177 vtable) of 1050 ops are JITed. and with unset LANG... $ rm jit_cp

Re: MMD (was This week's summary)

2003-06-10 Thread Adriano Rodrigues Ferreira
On Mon, 09 Jun 2003, Mark A. Biggar wrote: multi factorial (0) { 1 } multi factorial ($n) { $n * factorial($n - 1) } That's a bad example, as it's really not MMD. It's a partially pre-memoized function instead. It is MMD as long as the dispatching mechanism (of the language or the engine it runs o

Re: Devel::Coverage warning about POSIX.pm

2003-06-10 Thread Paul Johnson
Danny Faught said: > A "use POSIX" statement is causing Devel::Cover to issue a warning. > I've seen it both on Linux (RH7.3/Perl 5.6.1) and Cygwin (Win2K/Perl > 5.8.0). Has anyone investigated it? Hey, a harmless warning is the least of your worries ;-) I had noted the message. but not done a

RE: [perl #22633] [PATCH] convert parrot to continuation passing style

2003-06-10 Thread Jonathan Sillito
> -Original Message- > From: Jerome Vouillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The python interpreter seems rather slow. I get these numbers with the > Ocaml bytecode interpreter. > > mistral-jerome:/tmp > time python test.py > python test.py 2,59s user 0,00s system 100% cpu 2,582 tot

Re: [perl #22633] [PATCH] convert parrot to continuation passing style

2003-06-10 Thread Robert Spier
> > mistral-jerome:/tmp > time python test.py > > python test.py 2,59s user 0,00s system 100% cpu 2,582 total > > mistral-jerome:/tmp > ocamlc -o tst test.ml; time ./tst > > ./tst 0,14s user 0,00s system 106% cpu 0,131 total > > mistral-jerome:/tmp > cat test.ml > > let fo

How do I write a language debugger?

2003-06-10 Thread Clinton A. Pierce
(This is mostly a platform-specific question, as I've written a few and just need to know what I'm doing wrong.) The design for BASIC's debugger I've got now resembles this: .sub _main .local foo .local bar [...rest of declarations...] [PIR for statement 1...]

perl6-internals/parrot mailing list no longer archived?

2003-06-10 Thread Joe Wilson
http://archive.develooper.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/dateindex.html May 26 appears to be the last entry. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com

[perl #22633] [PATCH] convert parrot to continuation passing style

2003-06-10 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jonathan Sillito # Please include the string: [perl #22633] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=22633 > (This conflicts with "[perl #22592] [PATCH] Introduce macros for register access." b

Re: perl6-internals/parrot mailing list no longer archived?

2003-06-10 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:37 AM -0700 6/8/03, Joe Wilson wrote: http://archive.develooper.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/dateindex.html May 26 appears to be the last entry. I'll nudge Ask--the machine that holds the archive had a disk space issue a while back that might've killed the archiving process. The NNTP gateway, and

Re: [perl #22633] [PATCH] convert parrot to continuation passing style

2003-06-10 Thread Jerome Vouillon
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:07:31PM +, Jonathan Sillito wrote: > I am not satisfied with the time taken to make a call. I did some rough > benchmarking and the parrot implementation makes us slower than python > 2.2.1. The most expensive part of our call is the saveall/restoreall that > wraps th