Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
Douglas Hunter wrote:
[snip]
branch ONE_BOTTLE # 'bout time for a liver transplant
ONE_BOTTLE: # it's been fun
The ONE_BOTTLE label isn't gone to by anything else in the program, and
the one instruction which does go to it, is immediately before it.
So, what's the
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:53:22PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
> >And it also seems to want (by reading the makefile) bison and flex,
>
> No, the generated files are in CVS. If there is a timestamp problem,
> just touch imcparser.* and imclexer.c. And of course there
The suggestion was made last week that I try filtering the compiled BASIC
stuff through IMCC for performance reasons and whatnot.
The suggestion was also made (by me!) that I could produce a "milestone"
binary for Windows for distribution.
Well, my first attempt at all of the above didn't go we
Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
The ONE_BOTTLE label isn't gone to by anything else in the program, and
the one instruction which does go to it, is immediately before it.
So, what's the reason for it?
Lack of experience. Thanks for the pointer.
-- dug
At 9:00 AM -0500 3/20/03, Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
The suggestion was made last week that I try filtering the compiled
BASIC stuff through IMCC for performance reasons and whatnot.
The suggestion was also made (by me!) that I could produce a
"milestone" binary for Windows for distribution.
Well
Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
The suggestion was made last week that I try filtering the compiled
BASIC stuff through IMCC for performance reasons and whatnot.
IMCC seems to want headers that MSVC++ isn't happy with:
cl -nologo -O1 -MD -DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -D_CONSOLE -DNO_STRICT
-I../../in
At 12:00 AM + 3/20/03, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthijs Van Duin) writes:
OK, I suppose that works although that still means you're moving the
complexity from the perl implementation to its usage: in this case,
the perl 6 parser which is written in perl 6
No, I don't believe t
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 05:32:39PM -0500, James Mastros wrote:
> On 03/14/2003 3:22 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > That means that TPF's "perl development grant" fund is fine to donate
> > to, and if there's only enough cash for one grantee, and Larry's the
> > best candidate, that's keen. Setting u
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, David Storrs wrote:
> Folks, give us your address (or a PO box, or something), where we can
> send checks. The checks won't be tax deductible, but are we really
> doing this for the tax deduction?
... or a PayPal account. I've got $1.36 in my account ready to send to
the de
--- Matthijs van Duin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:46:50PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> >>They should be though, if a variable was hypothesized when the
> >>continuation was taken, then it should be hypothesized when that
> >>continuation is invoked.
> >
> >Should t
On Mar-21, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> >I think that this would make life easier for everyone. (because it also
> >saves
> >the 3 or 4 people on the list having to read tedious e-mail messages from
> >people about the subject)
>
> I'm currently not sure, if there are 4 peo
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:49:28AM -0800, Austin Hastings wrote:
--- Matthijs van Duin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you seem to have a much complexer model of hypotheses
than what's in my head.
The complex model is right -- in other words, if hypotheses are to be a
first-class part of the language t
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:38:31AM -0800, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
Here's what I take to be a (scheme) prototype of Matthijs' "success
continuations" approach. It actually works mostly by passing closures and
a state object, ...
Matthijs -- is this what you're describing?
It sounds like approach #2 ("
Oops, I just noticed Sean had mailed Dan and me privately, not on the list..
sorry for sending the reply here :-)
--
Matthijs van Duin -- May the Forth be with you!
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:53:22PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
And of course there are
flex/bisons for Win out there somewhere, if one wants actually change
the .l/.y sources.
Could we bodge round this by adding a Configure.pl flag to suppress adding
the rules to use b
> "David" == David Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Such a fund would be the ideal but, until it is set up, there is a
David> very easy way to fund the design team:
David> Folks, give us your address (or a PO box, or something), where we can
David> send checks. The checks won't be t
16 matches
Mail list logo
