I have a release candidate available at
http://foxglove.dnsalias.org/~sfink/parrot-0.0.10.tar.gz (please
excuse the poor bandwidth - for a better option, see below). I'll do
the actual release tomorrow, I just wanted to put it up now in case
anyone has time to give it a final lookover. I *think* I
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:46:31 +, Larry Wall wrote:
> If you say
>
> $foo.isa(Even)
>
> it doesn't just check to see if $foo is a member of class Int, but it also
> checks the constraints on type Even, and returns false unless $foo is an even
> integer.
>
> We could still call Even a clas
Nick --
I've been thinking of it like this:
class int isa intlike; # and isa value or whatever
class Int isa intlike; # and isa Object or whatever
class num isa numlike; # and isa value or whatever
class Num isa numlike; # and isa Object or whatever
...
class Scalar isa intlike, nu
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 6:19 PM +0100 3/16/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
It seems to contain already applied parts of the last sun4 JIT patch.
But its not a reverse patch.
Can it be safely ignored, or does it need some reworking before
applying it?
AFAIKT that patch needs heavy rediffing before
At 6:19 PM +0100 3/16/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
patch tells me this is a -R style patch. Could someone take a look
at it to see if it should be applied as a reverse patch, dropped,
or redone somehow?
It seems to contain already applied parts of the last sun4 JIT
patch. Bu
At 7:41 PM + 3/15/03, Leon Brocard (via RT) wrote:
Well, it's more of a new file than a patch. I'm aware that we're in a
code freeze, so I don't mind if this doesn't get it right now, but
it'd be nice ;-)
Applied, now that the tree's tagged and unfrozen.
--
At 3:02 AM + 3/15/03, Jason Gloudon (via RT) wrote:
This patch adds support for vtable calls in sun4/JIT as well as providing
additional ops.
patch tells me this is a -R style patch. Could someone take a look at
it to see if it should be applied as a reverse patch, dropped, or
redone somehow?
Okay, I think it's time for a make install target. Doesn't have to do
much, just install the parrot executable and associated programs (the
assembler, the disassembler, generated perl modules to make them
work) but it'd be nice so we can make executable snapshots for folks
to play with.
Takers
Dan Sugalski wrote:
patch tells me this is a -R style patch. Could someone take a look at it
to see if it should be applied as a reverse patch, dropped, or redone
somehow?
It seems to contain already applied parts of the last sun4 JIT patch.
But its not a reverse patch.
leo
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 05:09 PM, David Storrs wrote:
==QUESTION
- Page 8 says "In some languages, all methods are multimethods." I
believe that Java is one of these. Is that right and what are some
others? (This is really just curiousity.)
==/
Doesn't C++ work this way? Also I believe P
Greetings all,
Ok, it took me several days to get through A6, and I'm not caught up
on all the mail yet (though I've tried to skim so I don't repeat
someone else's question). I'm left with a bunch of questions; can
anyone answer the following:
==QUESTION
- Page 8 says "In some languages, all m
The answer to this question varies from platform to platform, and I've
only go windows to test on...
If I do 32 "save"s in a row, this will certainly be slower than doing a
single "push".
If I do 1 "save", this will (hopefully) be faster than 1 "push".
How many "save"s does it take to be to be
On Mar-17, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
>
> The answer to this question varies from platform to platform, and I've
> only go windows to test on...
>
> If I do 32 "save"s in a row, this will certainly be slower than doing a
> single "push".
>
> If I do 1 "save", this will (hopefully) be faster than 1
13 matches
Mail list logo
