Michael Lazzaro wrote:
"Joseph F. Ryan" wrote:
Perhaps in the grand scheme of things; however, anyone that is
redesigning a system should not be ignorant of how the old system
worked (even in the slightest degree), in order to know of what to
keep and what to throw away.
Oy. One more ti
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
> So 'if' and friends are just (native) subroutines with prototypes like:
>
>sub if (bool $c, Code $if_block) {...};
IIRC it's not that pretty, unfortunately, if you want to support this:
if $test1 {
# blah
} elsunless $test2 {
# New Ticket Created by Leon Brocard
# Please include the string: [perl #20400]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=20400 >
It's PASM1, not PASM. However, "make test" in languages/ook/ still
segfaults for me atm.
Leon Brocard (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Leon Brocard
# Please include the string: [perl #20400]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=20400 >
It's PASM1, not PASM. However, "make test" in languages/o
"Joseph F. Ryan" wrote:
> Sorry, I hope I didn't offend you. In that last remark I was in no way
> fingering you; I was simply speaking broadly.
Nah, you didn't -- I know what you meant. I was just getting very
worried about the direction the conversation has been heading lately.
Well, that and
Leopold Toetsch sent the following bits through the ether:
> No PASM1 is the one-line assembler PDB_compile in debug.c. If you want
> the whole thing, you have to run imcc instead of parrot and with the
> PASM compiler, just as the comment states.
Oops, I was confused. ook's 'make test' runs wi
Leon Brocard wrote:
Leopold Toetsch sent the following bits through the ether:
Oops, I was confused. ook's 'make test' runs with parrot, so it
doesn't work.
Yep, I should have changed that in the first place too ;-)
... I've attached a patch to config/gen/makefiles/ook.in to
make it work
--- Sean O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
> > So 'if' and friends are just (native) subroutines with prototypes like:
> >
> >sub if (bool $c, Code $if_block) {...};
>
> IIRC it's not that pretty, unfortunately, if you want to support this:
>
>
At 6:06 PM + 1/19/03, Leon Brocard wrote:
Leopold Toetsch sent the following bits through the ether:
No PASM1 is the one-line assembler PDB_compile in debug.c. If you want
the whole thing, you have to run imcc instead of parrot and with the
PASM compiler, just as the comment states.
Oop
At 7:38 PM +0100 1/19/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
IMHO in the near future, the main makefile of parrot should do
something equivalent to:
$ make
$ cd languages/imcc
$ make
$ cd -
$ mv parrot test_main
$ cp languages/imcc/imcc parrot
No--what we should do in the near future is:
$ make
$ make
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0100 1/19/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
IMHO in the near future, the main makefile of parrot should do
something equivalent to:
$ cp languages/imcc/imcc parrot
No--what we should do in the near future is:
$ make
$ make test
and be done with it. imcc sho
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 11:18, Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
> Ignorant of what? Surely we shouldn't assume that we're all
> ignorant of Perl?
Ignorant of the untold number of ways things could be done better.
Assuming the universe has an infinite number of possibilities, we have
0% of the expressive space o
At 10:39 AM 1/18/2003 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Jako compiler uses imcc as well...
While we are plugging...
and Cola too :)
-Melvin
> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:07:56 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Sean O'Rourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-SMTPD: qpsmtpd/0.20, http://develooper.com/code/qpsmtpd/
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
