Erik Lechak wrote:
> Just wondering: What would another documentation style have to
> provide to make it an acceptable replacement for pod?
being pod. you gotta love it ;-)
cheers,
Aldo
__END__
$_=q,just perl,,s, , another ,,s,$, hacker,,print;
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:06:05PM +, Jürgen Bömmels wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by J?rgen B?mmels
> # Please include the string: [perl #17936]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17936 >
>
>
> There a
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:29:09PM +, Simon Glover wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
> # Please include the string: [perl #17896]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17896 >
>
>
>
> This pa
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:45:06PM +, Simon Glover wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
> # Please include the string: [perl #17901]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17901 >
>
>
>
> Patch
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:09:54AM +, Simon Glover wrote:
> Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op;
> as an added bonus, it also tests two of the formats not previously
> tested (%b and %o).
Thanks, applied
Nicholas Clark
--
Even better than the real thing:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:47:48PM +, Jürgen Bömmels wrote:
> /usr/local/bin/gcc -g -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Winline
>-Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Winline -W
>-Wno-unused -Wsign-compare -Wformat-security -Wpacked -Wdisabled-
I did check in some patches WRT list/arrays.
list.c/list.h:
- fixed list_mark
- get_item/... return now PMC**
- added list_set_length + list truncation
intlist.c:
- uses List
- missing: parts of file header, clone
classes/{perl,}array.pmc
- use List
+ MANIFEST, parrot.h, makefile
Success ;-)
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> This has been applied, hasn't it? [Am I supposed to check somewhere other than
> the mailing list to learn this?]
I did add these missing entries, when I checked in my list integration
patch, which touched the MANIFEST anyway.
Sorry - no notice about that til now, a RL
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> There is somewhere a mailing list "cvs something" for checkins.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(and an archive on the web at archive.develooper.com)
Simon
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:31:53AM +, chromatic wrote:
> I've been browsing the docs, and took the time to do a bit of copyediting.
> There's room for more consistency -- sometimes the registers are called 'X'
> and 'Y' and other times 'x' and 'y'.
Yes, I did notice this. Is there any sor
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #17974]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17974 >
Following the recent PMC reorganization, lib/Parrot/PMC.pm is now in
the list of 'fl
Larry Wall wrote:
> I was thinking more along the lines of:
>
> $x &&& $y
> $x ||| $y
I very much like the new suggested uses for C<&> and C<|>, and making
the rarely-useful bitwise ops be longer to type.
But I'm not keen on trippled symbols: I reckon it's two easier to muddle
them wit
: > But then there's ~ vs ~~~ too.
:
: That gave me an idea. What about using the tilde as the first character
: in bitwise ops?
:
: $x ~& $y # bitwise and
: $x ~| $y # bitwise or
:
: ~!$x # bitwise not
I think I like that. Except now we'll get things like:
@x ^~|= @y;
Hmm
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Luke Palmer wrote:
: > In Perl, variable names always begin with a special character called
: > a sigil,
:
: Ahem, "funny character." The Camel glossary has no entry for "sigil"
: (though I realize it's common terminology).
"Sigil" is fine these days.
Larry
Larry Wall wrote:
> : $x ~& $y # bitwise and
> : $x ~| $y # bitwise or
> :
> : ~!$x # bitwise not
>
> I think I like that. Except now we'll get things like:
>
> @x ^~|= @y;
>
> Hmm...and then there's:
>
> $a ~? $b ~: $c
I don't think they're too problematic. Most peop
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:19:45PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:09:54AM +, Simon Glover wrote:
> > Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op;
> > as an added bonus, it also tests two of the formats not previously
> > tested (%b and %o).
>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:57:28PM +, Simon Glover wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
> # Please include the string: [perl #17974]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17974 >
>
> Following the
17 matches
Mail list logo
