I'm writing the function Parrot_destroy in embed.c and
I'm trying to use only functions that already exist, even if they do
nothing (PIO_atexit), but I can't find a destructor for the allocator,
so I was wondering if it needs to be written or if there's some reason
why it isn't needed.
Marco Ant
On 6/16/02 1:50 AM, Luke Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> Let's dump out the sack of namespace partitioning problems:
>>
>> What if Acme decides it wants to release part of it's code as Open Source?
>> (Happens a lot). Does it release it as Com::Acme::Text::Thing
Luke Palmer wrote:
> I know you heavyweights are working out how to specify the return value
> from a rule or a capture.
Larry says if the hypothetical variable $0 is assigned to, that assigned
value becomes the (only) return value of the rule. It's an elegant solution
to the problem.
> > Now
At 1:00 PM -0700 6/15/02, Marco Antonio Valenzuela
=?unknown-8bit?Q?Esc=E1rcega?= wrote:
>I'm writing the function Parrot_destroy in embed.c and
>I'm trying to use only functions that already exist, even if they do
>nothing (PIO_atexit), but I can't find a destructor for the allocator,
>so I was
