I've added a couple of functions to math.ops now.
What do you think about adding complex functions? ( complex.h )
/josef
diff -urN parrot.orig/MANIFEST parrot/MANIFEST
--- parrot.orig/MANIFESTThu Jun 13 00:12:15 2002
+++ parrot/MANIFEST Thu Jun 13 09:31:56 2002
@@ -354,6 +
If you are going to attend the Open Source Convention; please
consider putting in a lightning talk.
From: Nathan Torkington
Subject: [Oscon] Lightning Talks
Please pass the word around that we need more lightning talk
proposals:
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2002/create/e_sess?
Folks,
We have global variables. (And have for some time, according to the
commit logs)
I've tweaked core.ops a little, made sure the global symbol table is
part of the root set for the GC, and added in a test for it.
Anyone got anything else on the todo list that's actually done? :)
--
I'm still unclear as to how you implement lex-like longest token rule with
P6 regexes. If the | operator grabs the first one it matches, how do I
match "bacamus" out of this?:
"bacamus" =~ / b.*a | b.*s /
Luke
> I'm still unclear as to how you implement lex-like longest token rule with
> P6 regexes. If the | operator grabs the first one it matches, how do I
> match "bacamus" out of this?:
>
> "bacamus" =~ / b.*a | b.*s /
Borrow this trick from Parse::RecDescent:
rule max (*@candidate
Damian Conway:
# > I'm still unclear as to how you implement lex-like longest
# token rule
# > with P6 regexes. If the | operator grabs the first one it matches,
# > how do I match "bacamus" out of this?:
# >
# > "bacamus" =~ / b.*a | b.*s /
#
# Borrow this trick from Parse::RecDesce
I figured that (I actually did it, in a less-pretty form, in my early
Perl days when I wrote a syntax highlighter for my website). So there's
no elegant way the new regexes support it? That's a shame.
But I see now how state objects are a very cool idea.
Oh, and I'd just thought I'd let ever
Luke Palmer wrote:
> So there's no elegant way the new regexes support it?
> That's a shame.
seems fairly elegant to me, with 2 caveats:
First, we need assertions as part of the default library. I.e. we shouldn't
need a C for things like min and max.
Second, we should eliminate as much of
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, David Whipp wrote:
: Second, we should eliminate as much of the syntactic noise as possible:
:
:
:
: would be nice -- with parenthesis, or the like, needed only when things
: become ambiguous. I think, though am not sure, that having whitespace act as
: an arglist separat
I'll put this into RT tracker.
I noticed this while integrating some code from Angel Faus for
the IMCC compiler. The assembler currently does not check
if your register is in the correct range. So it allows:
set I11, -1
At least I don't think we've implemented unlimited register file size.
I've just committed the 3rd revision of the Parrot intermediate compiler.
Angel Faus has added register spilling to work with the graph-coloring
allocator. Currently we spill regs to an array in P31. Given that we don't
have random access stacks, this is the only fast way to do this.
Much thanks
Melvin Smith wrote:
>
> I'll put this into RT tracker.
>
> I noticed this while integrating some code from Angel Faus for
> the IMCC compiler. The assembler currently does not check
> if your register is in the correct range. So it allows:
>
> set I11, -1
>
> At least I don't think we've i
I came across this problem when writing the vim syntax file:
How can we tell the difference between these?:
m:option(pattern)
m:option(argument)/pattern/
Luke
Luke Palmer:
# I came across this problem when writing the vim syntax file:
#
# How can we tell the difference between these?:
#
# m:option(pattern)
# m:option(argument)/pattern/
The difference is that the first is a syntax error. :^) I think it
says that '(' is no longer a valid
> I came across this problem when writing the vim syntax file:
>
> How can we tell the difference between these?:
>
> m:option(pattern)
> m:option(argument)/pattern/
Easy. As A5 states, (...) are no longer leagal regex delimiters.
So the first is a syntax error.
:-)
Damian
hi
i am under win 2k perl 5.6.1
i have dowloaded and tried 0.0.6
there is a pb to compile (that is easely catched)
is it the place to give the patch ?
after that parrot .exe cannot run any program,
the message is :
segfault for the fact.pasm given in examples directory
or
pack_file_unpa
At 7:45 PM -0400 6/13/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
>I do not like the fact that we have to use keyed access at a low level
>to accomplish this, so I hope we consider adding random access
>to stacks.
It's on the list--it's just never gotten implemented. Time to fix
that, I think. We've added (or are w
What do you all think about adding a matrix class.
It would be really usefull to have it as a class..
Pseudo code:
new P0, Matrix, 3, 3
set P0, 0, 0, 1
set P0, 0, 1, 3
set P0, 0, 2, 1
set P0, 1, 0, 2
set P0, 1, 1, 2
set P0, 1, 2, 2
18 matches
Mail list logo
