The attached patch adds a new stack type that only handles INTVALs.
These are much more efficient than generic stacks--on Win32 they shave a
few ten-thousandths of a second off each run of the rx_popindex op, and
take a full hundredth of a second off the benchmark. It also shows
performance impro
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:51:25PM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote:
> Hey Nicholas,
>
> Just to be clear, I wasn't directing my concern at anyone, nor am I
> not glad for the work, heck you've probably contributed more to this project
> than me. It was just a general concern that I felt should be thou
The following patch cleans up some 700+ warnings on my Solaris 8/gcc-2.8
system. I've bundled them all together since they are (I hope)
non-controversial.
Two hunks merit special mention: The first is removing -ansi
-pendantic, which I ranted about yesterday, and is necessary to apply
to get an
Folks,
I've been downsized, and as a result I'm sans laptop for a bit. I'm going
to fix that soon, but until then my patch application will be a bit spotty
as I'm not quite set up for it.
So, if you've got commit privs and the patch passes muster on-list, or is
sensible, go commit it and we'll d
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:30:42AM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
> The attached patch adds a new stack type that only handles INTVALs.
> These are much more efficient than generic stacks--on Win32 they shave a
> few ten-thousandths of a second off each run of the rx_popindex op, and
> take a full hundre
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:11:10AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> diff -r -u parrot/classes/pmc2c.pl parrot-andy/classes/pmc2c.pl
> --- parrot/classes/pmc2c.pl Thu Jan 3 21:29:18 2002
> +++ parrot-andy/classes/pmc2c.pl Wed Jan 16 10:57:04 2002
> @@ -228,7 +228,12 @@
>
>my $includes =
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:25:29AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> should (Andy, Steve, Nick, Melvin, other folks I've forgotten) go over to
> dev.perl.com, set up an account, and pop me mail with your account
dev.perl.org
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:11:10AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > - fprintf(stderr," *** size %d\n",key->size);
> > + fprintf(stderr," *** size " INTVAL_FMT "\n",key->size);
>
> That's what I've been doing in my local copy, but is that portable? I
>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
>
> > - fprintf(stderr," *** size %d\n",key->size);
> > + fprintf(stderr," *** size " INTVAL_FMT "\n",key->size);
>
> That's what I've been doing in my local copy, but is that portable? I
> seem to remember that some preprocessors require strange tricks to
Steve Fink:
# On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:30:42AM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
# > The attached patch adds a new stack type that only handles INTVALs.
# > These are much more efficient than generic stacks--on Win32
# they shave a
# > few ten-thousandths of a second off each run of the
# rx_popindex op,
10 matches
Mail list logo
