On Friday 23 November 2001 10:10 pm, Angel Faus wrote:
> =item resubst s, s, ic
>
> Works like I, but it also declares that we want to do substitution
> and that the replacement string is $2.
By rematch's description, wouldn't that be $3? ($1 is the string to match
against, $2 is the compiled
"Gregor N. Purdy" wrote:
>
> Jeff ---
>
> > Rather wordy, I know, but it also points out how many places depend upon
> > the name 'core' in the current code.
> >
> > I'm also posting a different version shortly that combines core.ops and
> > vtable.ops into one core_ops.{c,h,pm}.
>
> Are the vt
On Saturday 24 November 2001 05:47 am, Brent Dax wrote:
> Bryan C. Warnock:
> # But given that, you need only define and forward and reverse
> # implementations of each op, and that will cover *all* regex
> # operations.
> # Forward, reverse, centrally-oriented, look-ahead and
> # look-behind - t
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 06:04:29PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> * Rewrite mops.pasm to use integer PMCs, and compare the speeds.
I couldn't wait. :)
% ../../test_prog mops.pbc
Iterations:1
Estimated ops: 2
Elapsed time: 9.948440
M op/s:20.103654
% ../../test_p
On Fri, 2001-11-23 at 13:41, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 06:04:29PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> > * Rewrite mops.pasm to use integer PMCs, and compare the speeds.
>
> I couldn't wait. :)
>
> % ../../test_prog mops.pbc
> Iterations:1
> Estimated ops: 2
At 04:57 PM 11/23/2001 +0100, Bart Lateur wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:46:09 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> >Nah, using an I register as a host-machine-address for jumps doesn't argue
> >for sizeof(INTVAL) >= sizeof(void *). Instead, it argues that the design
> >that uses an int as an absolute a
Along with testing in t/op/pmc.t
-Jeff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
