At 05:41 PM 4/30/2001 -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
>Dan Sugalski writes:
>: At 03:08 PM 4/25/2001 -0300, Branden wrote:
>:
>: >At 01:52 PM 25/04/2001 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>: >>Seriously, I don't see why this should be a scary thing. So, the opcode
>: >>table's extendable. So what? It'll make lan
At 12:01 PM 4/27/2001 -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > At this stage, it might be better to go through and pull out the concepts
> > and capabilities we need, rather than get into the details of user
> > interface. Knowing, for example, that we need to provid
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> >We don't have continuations yet...
>
> But there's nothing at the lowest levels of the interpreter that prevent
> that. You could, if you chose, get a stream of bytecode that would do you
> continuations. Slowly and awkwardly, perhaps, but still do them. (I'm all
> up f
