Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)

2001-02-27 Thread Piers Cawley
Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Command-line flags on by default [-T -Mstrict -Mwarnings]: > > > > We already beat this to death with the .perlrc discussion. You'll > > break reams of Perl code you probably don't even know you have this > > way.

quote for the day

2001-02-27 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
What is this talk of software 'releases'? Klingons do not 'release' software; our software ESCAPES, leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance people in its wake! -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It

Re: quote for the day

2001-02-27 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
>What is this talk of software 'releases'? Klingons do not 'release' software; >our software ESCAPES, leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality >assurance people in its wake! Sorry, forgot the annotation: -- seen as the .sig of Malcolm Purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, used completely without

Re: End-of-scope actions: Unexpected behavior.

2001-02-27 Thread Tony Olekshy
David Grove wrote: > > This is what's scaring me about all this talk about exceptions... > it can [...] make Perl into a "complainer language" belching up > uncaught (don't care) exceptions forcing try/except blocks around > every piece of IO or DB handling. I respect David's concerns. What's sc