> Wow! You're good!
Thanks, can I quote you ??
> However, the "marriage" part of your prediction is
> already *mostly* true... future Python... same vein as Lisp
> -- only the people who really grok Lisp can see it.
> I totally disagree with your last point though.
Thats ok,
> Perl has staye
At 12:35 AM 11/6/00 +0100, dLux wrote:
> I am a big perl fan (as most people here), and I dunno where I can
>find up-to-date info about perl6.
http://dev.perl.org is a good place to look. Once things get moving on the
internals I hope to keep http://use.perl.org informed as well.
>I am esp
FTC = FCC (= FDA = DEA = FBI = DOJ = DOA = CIA = Ma_FIA = ...)
John van V writes:
> FTC = FCC (= FDA = DEA = FBI = DOJ = DOA = CIA = Ma_FIA = ...)
This is so far away from being of use to the perl6-internals list,
I'm surprised to see it here.
Let's get back to design. Dan?
Nat
I've just read Mark-Jason Dominus' article on www.perl.com, I've been away
from perl6-meta for a while (a month) and I thought I'd catch up a bit.
It's not often you read something as unhelpful as this article.
Like most Perl programmers I just use the language. I have never been
involved in the
