On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 10:02:23PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 07:25:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > libraries and tools are better than the vendor counterparts; Sun's
> > compilers and linkers are considerably better than GNU's for SPARC C code,
> > for example.
John Tobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am furthermore *not* suggesting dropping support for non-Unix or
> non-GCC platforms. I am merely saying that that is not where our focus
> should be.
I think our focus should be on portable, standards-compliant code that
will run on any platform that
Ariel Scolnicov wrote:
> <...infinite lists...>
> This (and your preceeding messages on the subject) is unfortunately
> not possible to do in a clean manner; for that matter, neither is the
> (..0) proposal. The I in which results are produced depends on
> the order in which you generate the elem
