Am Montag, den 03.08.2009, 11:04 +1000 schrieb Timothy S. Nelson:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Raphael Descamps wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have seen that wayland76 was playing with an XML Grammar on #perl6, so
> > I think that it was maybe the time to send what I already
2009/8/3 Timothy S. Nelson :
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Raphael Descamps wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have seen that wayland76 was playing with an XML Grammar on #perl6, so
>> I think that it was maybe the time to send what I already have done.
>
> Raphael: I don
Em Seg, 2009-08-03 às 11:04 +1000, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> However, my main reason for modifying it was that I needed actions for
> what I'm doing. So I'll keep working on that.
http://gist.github.com/161467
just to tease :) -- this making the grammar closer to the XML spec...
dani
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Raphael Descamps wrote:
Hi,
I have seen that wayland76 was playing with an XML Grammar on #perl6, so
I think that it was maybe the time to send what I already have done.
Raphael: I don't say any of this to discourage you, but to present
alternatives to the
Hi,
I have seen that wayland76 was playing with an XML Grammar on #perl6, so
I think that it was maybe the time to send what I already have done.
Maybe it should be a perl6.user posting, but as there is actualy no
working xml library available for perl 6 and it is a good test for how
it feel to
Three years ago I wrote a simple Perl 5 script to convert the EBNF
specification of XML to Perl 6's rules.
Pugs supports rules now, so perhaps it can be tested. This is a complex
job (because it's a complex grammar, and of course it can never work
without much tweaking, and debugging grammars is p
