Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Tupshin Harper wrote:
I'm not a "GCC person", but I do have an interest in this working. I
did some exploratory work (mostly getting familiar with the GCC
backend mechanism and with PASM), and quickly ran into what appeared
to be fundamental
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> Tupshin Harper wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm not a "GCC person", but I do have an interest in this working. I
> > did some exploratory work (mostly getting familiar with the GCC
> > backend mechanism and with PASM), and quickly ran into what appeared
> > to be fundamental roadbl
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Tupshin Harper wrote:
I'm not a "GCC person", but I do have an interest in this working. I
did some exploratory work (mostly getting familiar with the GCC
backend mechanism and with PASM), and quickly ran into what appeared
to be fundamental roadblocks regarding gcc's pr
Tupshin Harper wrote:
I'm not a "GCC person", but I do have an interest in this working. I did
some exploratory work (mostly getting familiar with the GCC backend
mechanism and with PASM), and quickly ran into what appeared to be
fundamental roadblocks regarding gcc's predilection for generatin
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Why the smilies ;-) Parrot is a fine processor well suited for an
optimizing compiler and with a reasonable architecture. Its not the
first time that I'm thinking of such a hack.
... though it would need some extensions at both sides.
Are some gcc people listening?
leo
I
Christian Renz wrote:
The easiest way isn't avaialble yet. That is custom dynamically loaded
PMCs (classes) representing some functionality.
Hmm... then I think I misunderstood something. I thought PMCs are
only used for language-specific data types (e.g. "PerlScalar",
I thought of wxWindows data
The easiest way isn't avaialble yet. That is custom dynamically loaded
PMCs (classes) representing some functionality.
Hmm... then I think I misunderstood something. I thought PMCs are
only used for language-specific data types (e.g. "PerlScalar",
"PythonString") that are part of the Parrot core a
Christian Renz wrote:
What is the easiest way to make a monster like wxWindows (in terms of
classes) available for Parrot?
The easiest way isn't avaialble yet. That is custom dynamically loaded
PMCs (classes) representing some functionality. Alreay working is the
NCI (Native call interface) to
GUI toolkit for Parrot -- TIMTOWTDI -- but it sure would be sweet to
have, and definitely would not hurt Parrot-based application
Whoops. Just to clarify: It would be sweet to have an interface for
wxWindows in Parrot -- not the official endorsement.
And let me try to formulate a nice and clear que
Actually, I was the one mentioning it in a completely offhand remark
in some discussion about the future of wxWindows ;-).
I'm not looking for official endorsement of wxWindows as "the"
GUI toolkit for Parrot -- TIMTOWTDI -- but it sure would be sweet to
have, and definitely would not hurt Parrot-b
10 matches
Mail list logo
