Hi!
> I like the idea of leveraging the wxPerl XS files. Any comments on why
> you introduced xsubppp (on top of xsubpp) for some XS files?
XS++ is much less verbose than plain XS when writing
C++ code [1], and it allows me to handle some C++ features
(like passing/returning references) without
Ciao Mattia,
thanks for your reply. I read a bit about ABI and I guess it's
something I only want to touch with a long pole, that pole being an
extra layer of indirection I initially hoped to be able to avoid.
I like the idea of leveraging the wxPerl XS files. Any comments on why
you introduced
Mattia Barbon wrote:
> ... or you might use
> the C++-to-C bindings that have been created for wx.NET and/or wxEiffel.
wxEiffel can be accessed from here:
http://eiffelzone.com/esd/wxeiffel/index.html
It hasn't been maintained for a few years, but the C bindings might
still be a useful basis for
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:33:50 +0200 Christian Renz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
> How do I find the right symbol name for a function? For example, the
> void wxBell(void) function can be found in the library as __Z6wxBellv
> (found using otool -vT /usr/lib/libwx.dylib), but I guess on Wind
Hi all,
I've recently decided to try to hook up the wxWidgets GUI library with
parrot and Pugs. I haven't dabbled much with parrot yet so I consider
this a good way to learn more :-).
Right at the start, I ran into a curious problem loading the Wx
libraries with loadlib. (I'm on Mac OS X 10.4, b
