Re: txt vs OO [was: "Re: Proposal to make class method non-inheritable"]

2005-10-26 Thread Andrew Savige
--- Larry Wall wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:24:52PM +0200, Michele Dondi wrote: > : But maybe that's just me. Whatever, I guess that the {casual,average} > : programmer may be scared by its richness and complexity. > > But we're trying to design the OO features (indeed, all of Perl 6) > su

Re: txt vs OO [was: "Re: Proposal to make class method non-inheritable"]

2005-10-26 Thread Larry Wall
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:36:48AM +0200, Michele Dondi wrote: : On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Larry Wall wrote: : : >But we're trying to design the OO features (indeed, all of Perl 6) : >such that you can usefully cargo cult those aspects that are of : >immediate interest without being forced to learn the

Re: txt vs OO [was: "Re: Proposal to make class method non-inheritable"]

2005-10-26 Thread Michele Dondi
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Larry Wall wrote: But we're trying to design the OO features (indeed, all of Perl 6) such that you can usefully cargo cult those aspects that are of immediate interest without being forced to learn the whole thing. It's not the number one design goal, but it's right up there

Re: txt vs OO [was: "Re: Proposal to make class method non-inheritable"]

2005-10-25 Thread Larry Wall
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:24:52PM +0200, Michele Dondi wrote: : Also, Perl6 OO capabilities are already above the top of my head. Sure, they're above my head too. Which should be obvious by now... :-) : But maybe that's just me. Whatever, I guess that the {casual,average} : programmer may be

Re: txt vs OO [was: "Re: Proposal to make class method non-inheritable"]

2005-10-25 Thread Michele Dondi
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Stevan Little wrote: Well, the point is that it is interesting to note that "text processing" is an _application area_, whereas "OO programming" is a programming language paradigm. Allow me to clarify. Perl 5 (and below) are known by outsiders (non-perl users) as bein

Re: txt vs OO [was: "Re: Proposal to make class method non-inheritable"]

2005-10-25 Thread Stevan Little
On Oct 25, 2005, at 6:31 AM, Michele Dondi wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Stevan Little wrote: I think Perl 6's OO system has the potential to be to OO programming what Perl 5, etc was to text processing. This, I believe, is in large part due to Sorry for replying so late. Thought it seems ap

txt vs OO [was: "Re: Proposal to make class method non-inheritable"]

2005-10-25 Thread Michele Dondi
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Stevan Little wrote: I think Perl 6's OO system has the potential to be to OO programming what Perl 5, etc was to text processing. This, I believe, is in large part due to Sorry for replying so late. Thought it seems appropriate to post this in this time of "Perl 6 fears"