On 6/20/06, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Charles Reiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since I don't think the three-tiered threading system is going to be
> implemented very soon, I'd like to propose that thread creation
> instead be done with one new method of a ParrotThread
"Charles Reiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since I don't think the three-tiered threading system is going to be
implemented very soon, I'd like to propose that thread creation
instead be done with one new method of a ParrotThread object:
=item Carguments...)>
Maybe we should go for a name tha
Below is a proposal to change the syntax for creation of threads. The
primary change is a move away from the original interface which had
three thread-creation functions: thread1, thread2, and thread3. These
were supposed to create threads in one of three types, see, e.g.,
Dan's proposal at
http:/
