On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Will Coleda wrote:
> Good! [inline] isn't real Tcl, it's specific to partcl.
>
> That test consists of the code:
>
> inline PASM {
>print "ok\n"
> }
>
> which should do the obvious thing. Odd that it's squawking about MMD_add.
It's very strange. It copied that snip
Good! [inline] isn't real Tcl, it's specific to partcl.
That test consists of the code:
inline PASM {
print "ok\n"
}
which should do the obvious thing. Odd that it's squawking about
MMD_add.
Can you 1) try this PIR, and 2) if that *works*, copy that tcl
snippet to "examples/foo.tcl"
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Will Coleda wrote:
> Done. All tests pass for tcl in leo-ctx5. (And with leo's recent fixes,
> hopefully this means on all platforms for real this time. =-)
>
> This should also fix the problem on windows, as the missing functions have
> been uncommented, and are now availabl
I can confirm that all tests are now passing on Linux/x86 with r9202.
--
All tests successful.
Files=47, Tests=446, 40 wallclock secs (28.78 cusr + 4.18 csys = 32.96 CPU)
--
-J
--
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:24:09PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
> Done. All tests pass for tcl in leo-ctx5. (And with
Done. All tests pass for tcl in leo-ctx5. (And with leo's recent
fixes, hopefully this means on all platforms for real this time. =-)
This should also fix the problem on windows, as the missing functions
have been uncommented, and are now available.
Please svn up and retest.
On Sep 15, 200
Minor change to the exception PMC in the leo-ct5 branch - all
exception class tests pass, but this version allows HLLs to use two
slots in the exception object as a stopgap.
This came up as I'm in near the end of converting tcl in leo-ctx5:
versions to date have used two return codes to ind
