Re: semantic and implementation of pairs

2004-04-13 Thread Stéphane Payrard
I have confused assignement and initialisation in my previous mail. Because they are two different operations, there is no problem they have different semantics. A6 described both operations. It described pairs as arguments used to initialize parameters and pairs in assignement. -- stef

Re: semantic and implementation of pairs

2004-04-11 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > More generally, in pmcs that act as composite containers which > elements are not necessarily pmc, we need these cloning methods as well: > PMC* clone_pmc_keyed(PMC* key) > PMC* clone_pmc_keyed_int(INTVAL key) > PMC* clone_pmc_keyed_str(STRING*

semantic and implementation of pairs

2004-04-10 Thread Stéphane Payrard
My understanding of the semantic of pairs as in A6: A pair in a given scalar context should return its first element coerced to match the said context. This seems to be a prerequisite to use pairs as function arguments. Example with the boolean context: bool $b = a => 10; # $b == 1