According to Nicholas Clark:
> Is it being used as part of an optimisation? Is it so that memory for
> structures can be allocated with calloc() (or later reset to all bits zero)
> and then in the source to reset that structure a macro used to write
> 0 to all the pointers? On a platform where a NU
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:39:39PM -0500, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> The SET_NON_ZERO_NULL macro is silly. On any arch where null pointers
> are not represented as all zeroes, the null pointer value is still
> *spelled* "0" in source code. C always works, for all
> values of FOO and all architectur
The SET_NON_ZERO_NULL macro is silly. On any arch where null pointers
are not represented as all zeroes, the null pointer value is still
*spelled* "0" in source code. C always works, for all
values of FOO and all architectures.
If I'm missing something, please speak up.
--
Chip Salzenberg
