On 03/27/2017 10:43 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:10 PM, ToddAndMargo mailto:toddandma...@zoho.com>> wrote:
Am I reintroducing a "regex"
It's a junction, not a regex. But junctions are even slower than
regexes: they are, in effect, trying to emulate a quantum comput
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:10 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Am I reintroducing a "regex"
It's a junction, not a regex. But junctions are even slower than regexes:
they are, in effect, trying to emulate a quantum computer. I suspect it's
doubly slow because not only are junctions themselves not optim
Yeah, junctions are super useful, but not very fast.
compare these two pieces of code:
so "hello how are you today?".contains("hello" & "u t") for ^1_000_000
and
my $target = "hello how are you today?"; so
$target.contains("hello") && $target.contains("u t") for ^1_000_000
On my machi
Hi All,
When I do a
if $x.contains( $y & "abc" )
Am I reintroducing a "regex" and losing the performance
gained by avoiding a regex? Doesn't look like
it to me, but I thought I'd better double check.
Many thanks,
-T
--
~~
Computers are like air condi
