On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:11:24AM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
> from a read of the spec, the expected behavior of this code is unclear to me.
>
> in the rule, i'm matching the builtin whitespace rule, creating an
> alias with the same name as the named rule, and matching the builtin
> rule again. thi
from a read of the spec, the expected behavior of this code is unclear to me.
in the rule, i'm matching the builtin whitespace rule, creating an
alias with the same name as the named rule, and matching the builtin
rule again. this brings up a few questions:
does the alias replace the named rule o
