Re: pdd20 questions

2005-11-30 Thread Jonathan Sillito
On 11/30/05, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What you're missing is that without the :outer information, Parrot > wouldn't be able to decide *which* LexPads *should* be searched, > either now (find_lex w/o LexEnv) or later (newclosure -> LexEnv). Right and I see that this is consist

Re: pdd20 questions

2005-11-30 Thread Chip Salzenberg
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:58:28PM -0800, Jonathan Sillito wrote: > On 11/30/05, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:02:08PM -0800, Jonathan Sillito wrote: > > > 2. Should we provide a way for a compiler to provide depths to the > > > find_lex and store_lex ops

Re: pdd20 questions

2005-11-30 Thread Jonathan Sillito
On 11/30/05, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:02:08PM -0800, Jonathan Sillito wrote: > > I have some clarification questions about the new pdd20 > > > 1. What is expected to be in P0 in: > >.lex "$a", P0 > > The ".lex" directive is compile-time only, and h

Re: pdd20 questions

2005-11-30 Thread Chip Salzenberg
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:02:08PM -0800, Jonathan Sillito wrote: > I have some clarification questions about the new pdd20 on lexical > variables -- likely stemming from my having been out of it for so > long. Also I am happy to send a patch to pdd20 capturing these > clarifications once I am sure

pdd20 questions

2005-11-30 Thread Jonathan Sillito
I have some clarification questions about the new pdd20 on lexical variables -- likely stemming from my having been out of it for so long. Also I am happy to send a patch to pdd20 capturing these clarifications once I am sure I understand things correctly. 1. What is expected to be in P0 in: .