> But what should those addresses do when receiving a message?
> - parrotbug: should open a RT ticket?
Yes. This is the new equivalent of bugs-parrot at rt.perl.org.
Use of that address should be phased out in favor of the new one.
> - status-ok: ?
> - status-nok: should open a RT ticket
At 10:38 AM + 3/5/04, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Jerome Quelin wrote in perl.perl6.internals :
But what should those addresses do when receiving a message?
- parrotbug: should open a RT ticket?
- status-ok: ?
- status-nok: should open a RT ticket?
Excuse me from stepping in, but I don't se
Jerome Quelin wrote in perl.perl6.internals :
>
> But what should those addresses do when receiving a message?
> - parrotbug: should open a RT ticket?
> - status-ok: ?
> - status-nok: should open a RT ticket?
Excuse me from stepping in, but I don't see why three adresses are
necessary. From my (l
Robert Spier wrote:
> > The mails are indeed sent to parrotbug, parrotstatus-ok and
> > parrotstatus-nok (at parrotcode.org) for resp. bug reports, ok
> > reports or nok reports. And since I don't think those addresses are
> > set up...
> Not yet. I'm nudging Ask regularly about this.
But what sh
> The mails are indeed sent to parrotbug, parrotstatus-ok and
> parrotstatus-nok (at parrotcode.org) for resp. bug reports, ok reports
> or nok reports. And since I don't think those addresses are set
> up...
Not yet. I'm nudging Ask regularly about this.
-R
... or at least for some definition of working.
The mails are indeed sent to parrotbug, parrotstatus-ok and
parrotstatus-nok (at parrotcode.org) for resp. bug reports, ok reports
or nok reports. And since I don't think those addresses are set up...
"parrotbug -h" will give you some indications
