Re: objects.t failures

2003-07-23 Thread Jonathan Worthington
> Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > OK, I've committed it. > > I'll just confirm that FreeBSD/x86 now passes objects.t. And so does Win32. Latest nmake test output:- Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --

Re: objects.t failures

2003-07-23 Thread Lars Balker Rasmussen
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, I've committed it. I'll just confirm that FreeBSD/x86 now passes objects.t. -- Lars Balker Rasmussen Consult::Perl

Re: objects.t failures

2003-07-23 Thread Simon Glover
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 1:45 PM -0400 7/23/03, Simon Glover wrote: > > > > I think I've figured out why these tests are failing on some, but not > > all, platforms -- it's a GC bug. Specifically, we're not including the > > class_hash as part of the root set, so the garba

Re: objects.t failures

2003-07-23 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 1:45 PM -0400 7/23/03, Simon Glover wrote: I think I've figured out why these tests are failing on some, but not all, platforms -- it's a GC bug. Specifically, we're not including the class_hash as part of the root set, so the garbage collector can potentially reclaim it before we try to use

objects.t failures

2003-07-23 Thread Simon Glover
I think I've figured out why these tests are failing on some, but not all, platforms -- it's a GC bug. Specifically, we're not including the class_hash as part of the root set, so the garbage collector can potentially reclaim it before we try to use it. The patch below seems to fix the probl