This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
New Perl Mascot
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 28 Sep 2000
Last Modified: 30 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 343
Version: 2
Status:
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 11:52:40AM -0500, David Grove wrote:
> That's the current running hope, I'll change the RFC to match it shortly.
> However, since I can't realistically expect this to happen, it wouldn't make
> sense to do more than suggest it as a first course of action.
I don't think i
Hello David,
only one question:
i like the camel-icon very much.
maybe it is possible to convince O'Reilly, to donate
the trademark of the Camel, to larry?
regards
Gerrit
--
Gerrit Peter Haase
That's the current running hope, I'll change the RFC to match it shortly.
However, since I can't realistically expect this to happen, it wouldn't make
sense to do more than suggest it as a first course of action.
On Saturday, September 30, 2000 6:48 AM, Gerrit Haase
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wr
> New Perl Mascot
>
> Maintainer: David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 28 Sep 2000
> Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Number: 343
> Version: 1
> Status: Developing
I basically agree that we need a mascot, and one that isn't encumbered
CTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 8:20 PM
> Subject: RE: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot
>
>
> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:46:44 -0500, David Grove wrote:
> > [RFC 343 v1]
> >
> > A camel is a ho
Err.. A new version of a popular programming language?
- Original Message -
From: "Rocco Caputo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 8:20 PM
Subject: RE: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot
&g
At 14:01 -0500 2000.09.29, Garrett Goebel wrote:
>From: Tim Conrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>> I don't know trademark law, but it seems unlikely that
>> O'Reilly can trademark the concept of the camel, or all
>> representations of the camel.
>
>No. They can't trademark the "concept" of the ca
David Grove wrote:
> > =head1 TITLE
> >
> > New Perl Mascot
> >
> > =head1 VERSION
> >
> > Maintainer: David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 28 Sep 2000
> > Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Number: 343
> >
Tim Conrow wrote:
> I don't know trademark law, but it seems unlikely that O'Reilly can
> trademark the concept of the camel, or all representations of the camel.
I checked out the O'Reilly trademark at one point at the USA Trademark and
Patent Office site. I don't have time to dig up the resul
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:46:44 -0500, David Grove wrote:
[RFC 343 v1]
A camel is a horse designed by committee. What do you get when you
design a camel by committee?
-- Rocco Caputo / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Tim Conrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I don't know trademark law, but it seems unlikely that
> O'Reilly can trademark the concept of the camel, or all
> representations of the camel.
No. They can't trademark the "concept" of the camel. But they _have_
trademarked their camel logo and i
Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> =head1 TITLE
>
> New Perl Mascot
>
> =head1 ABSTRACT
>
> Perl has no common symbol usable by the public at large to state to
> the world "I am a Perl Programmer, and D**n Proud Of It!"
>
> =head1 DESCRIPTION
>
> The
On Thursday, September 28, 2000 10:33 PM, Perl6 RFC Librarian
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> This and other RFCs are available on the web at
> http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
>
> =head1 TITLE
>
> New Perl Mascot
>
> =head1 VERSION
>
> Maintainer: David Grove <[E
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
New Perl Mascot
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 28 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 343
Version: 1
Status: Developing
=head1 ABSTRACT
Pe
15 matches
Mail list logo
