Here is the latest-and-greatest version, incorporating your helpful
feedback.
I've tried using .namespace, but haven't worked out how best to do this.
I also tried removing underscores from some of the names, but didn't
have much success their either, so they're back. It'll be a few days
befor
Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I tried using the @MAIN pragma, this seemed to break with JIT
Brr. Fixed. A bug hanging around really long and waiting for mainly
integer stuff and @MAIN not at byte_code[0].
The JIT optimizer, which also looks at branches didn't look at anything
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> .namespace["Digest::MD5"]
Ack
> Leo, what is the status of the pending changes WRT library paths?
Mainly a missing portable way to find the library. *But* searching in
C is working for current platforms, so we can
do the same for /library. We just n
At 4:41 PM +0200 4/28/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * runtime/parrot/include/Digest_MD5.imc (_md5sum and _md5_print calls)
* examples/assembly/md5sum.imc
* imcc/t/syn/md5.t
I don't know if the test lives in the most appropriate directory.
Rather n
Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've now split the code into a library, an example and a test.
Good.
> * runtime/parrot/include/Digest_MD5.imc (_md5sum and _md5_print calls)
> * examples/assembly/md5sum.imc
> * imcc/t/syn/md5.t
> I don't know if the test lives in the most appr
Hi!
On Wednesday 28 April 2004 14:31, Nick Glencross wrote:
> Time for an update.
>
> I've now split the code into a library, an example and a test.
>
> * runtime/parrot/include/Digest_MD5.imc (_md5sum and _md5_print calls)
runtime/parrot/library/Digest/MD5.imc should IMO be better.
You should p
Time for an update.
I've now split the code into a library, an example and a test.
* runtime/parrot/include/Digest_MD5.imc (_md5sum and _md5_print calls)
* examples/assembly/md5sum.imc
* imcc/t/syn/md5.t
I don't know if the test lives in the most appropriate directory.
Investigating why some che
