On 7/11/06, Gaal Yahas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:55:25PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> I believe that the current Test.pm already qualifies as a baby-Perl
> implementation, as overall its functionality is quite simple, and it
> uses very little of the language (especia
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:55:25PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> I believe that the current Test.pm already qualifies as a baby-Perl
> implementation, as overall its functionality is quite simple, and it
> uses very little of the language (especially since its use of
> junctions was removed a fe
At 6:53 PM +0300 7/10/06, Gaal Yahas wrote:
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:47:17AM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
As briefly discussed on #perl6 ...
As briefly replied there before being jethandled...
As further discussed there ...
Perhaps we need a baby-Perl Test::Simple for new implementations
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:47:17AM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> As briefly discussed on #perl6 ...
As briefly replied there before being jethandled...
> I propose that we make like Sun and its Java VM validation suite,
> and start distributing the Perl 6 test suite as its own distribution
> on C
As briefly discussed on #perl6 ...
Now that we are fulfilling an intention for Perl 6 to have multiple
fully decoupled implementations that are distinct from its spec, Pugs
and v6.pm being the largest short term examples, I propose that we
make like Sun and its Java VM validation suite, and st
