Re: kdb

2001-02-09 Thread Branden
Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:13:46PM -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Could you be more specific about your intents about that language? Do you > > have more information about it (some interesting syntax, or some scripts > > that could inspire new features or interestin

Re: kdb

2001-02-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:13:46PM -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > Well yah! Perl6 array indeed. It also reminds me of PDL. i like the > > data model. It looks like FAME done right. > > Are you suggesting we borrow some features of it? Take some inspiration on >

Re: kdb

2001-02-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:49 AM 2/9/2001 -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: >On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:16:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At 09:36 AM 2/9/2001 -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > >Does everyone already know about www.kx.com ? > > > > What about it? Looks like yet another semi-specialized relati

Re: kdb

2001-02-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 01:51:02PM -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > Does everyone already know about www.kx.com ? > > Well, I found Kdb nothing awesome... The K language I thought it's a > somewhat interesting, specially the part on "bu

Re: kdb

2001-02-09 Thread Branden
Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > Does everyone already know about www.kx.com ? > Well, I found Kdb nothing awesome... The K language I thought it's a somewhat interesting, specially the part on "bulk operators", which I think is the same that is intended to do with Perl 6 arr

Re: kdb

2001-02-09 Thread Branden
Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 01:51:02PM -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Well, I found Kdb nothing awesome... The K language I thought it's a > > somewhat interesting, specially the part on "bulk operators", which I think > > is the sam

Re: kdb

2001-02-09 Thread Branden
Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:16:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At 09:36 AM 2/9/2001 -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > >Does everyone already know about www.kx.com ? > > > > What about it? Looks like yet another semi-specialized relational database > > company.

Re: kdb

2001-02-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:16:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 09:36 AM 2/9/2001 -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > >Does everyone already know about www.kx.com ? > > What about it? Looks like yet another semi-specialized relational database > company. (With a far too clever website) Am

Re: kdb

2001-02-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 09:36 AM 2/9/2001 -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: >Does everyone already know about www.kx.com ? What about it? Looks like yet another semi-specialized relational database company. (With a far too clever website) Dan --

kdb

2001-02-09 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
Does everyone already know about www.kx.com ? -- May the best description of competition prevail. (via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)