Jeff Clites wrote:
Hi Leo:
I was reading over you incremental GC posts from about a month ago, and
read the referenced paper--quite nice work you've done in implementing
the ideas there.
I have one question: What about finalizers? I may have just missed it,
but it would seem that calling finali
"Jeff Clites" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was reading over you incremental GC posts from about a month ago, and
> read the referenced paper--quite nice work you've done in implementing
> the ideas there.
>
> I have one question: What about finalizers? I may have just missed it,
> but it woul
Hi Leo:
I was reading over you incremental GC posts from about a month ago, and
read the referenced paper--quite nice work you've done in implementing
the ideas there.
I have one question: What about finalizers? I may have just missed it,
but it would seem that calling finalizers would require
