Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> foo.baz is a method or member access
> foo . baz is concatenation
So it is now. CONCAT requires whitespace on either side.
> -Melvin
leo
At 02:42 PM 3/13/2004 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
> > currently, the pir line
> > S5 = S5 . 'foo'
> > produces
> > error:imcc:object isn't a PMC
> >
> > concatenation with . seems to be gone
> > i cannot think of a good replacement for it
>
This should be fixable with some lexer or parser twe
On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 17:07, luka frelih wrote:
> > But how should the two interpretations of x.x be resolved? Is that
> > concatenation or method calling?
>
> wouldnt it be better to keep . as string glue
> and have method calls use the arrow -> or some
> such?
Or follow perl6 and use ~ for stri
On Mar-13, Luke Palmer wrote:
> luka frelih writes:
> > >But how should the two interpretations of x.x be resolved? Is that
> > >concatenation or method calling?
> >
> > currently, the pir line
> > S5 = S5 . 'foo'
> > produces
> > error:imcc:object isn't a PMC
> >
> > concatenation with
luka frelih writes:
> >But how should the two interpretations of x.x be resolved? Is that
> >concatenation or method calling?
>
> currently, the pir line
> S5 = S5 . 'foo'
> produces
> error:imcc:object isn't a PMC
>
> concatenation with . seems to be gone
> i cannot think of a good
But how should the two interpretations of x.x be resolved? Is that
concatenation or method calling?
currently, the pir line
S5 = S5 . 'foo'
produces
error:imcc:object isn't a PMC
concatenation with . seems to be gone
i cannot think of a good replacement for it
wouldnt it be better
