On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:43:00AM +0200, Peter Gibbs wrote:
Reformatted slightly as "X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400"
seems to like re-wrapping your hardwrapped lines.
> Reading this made me wonder if we should consider cached string
> transcodings, if we don't end up storing
Steve Fink wrote:
Reading this made me wonder if we should consider cached string
transcodings,
if we don't end up storing strings in a single form internally. The worst
case is
probably string constants, which could be transcoded over and over again
into
the same alternate encoding. As an exten
The hashtable currently has correctness and efficiency problems
resulting from string encodings (and their interaction with garbage
collection).
Correctness example:
Currently, string hash values are computed by going straight to the
actual data and running a fairly typical hashing algorithm. Th
