Hi Brad and Yari,
Thanks very much for your in depth explanations.
Regards,
Marcel
Brad Gilbert wrote:
>Which shows that if you are dealing with a Hash it is probably better
>to use a % variable.
Indeed and coming from Perl 5 I find using the sigils % and @ for "does
Associative" and "does Positional" maps better to that experience.
> my %a = :s1(4.3), :s2(2.1), :s3(5.3);
{s1 =
You created a single Hash then assigned it to two variables.
Also `clone` always does a shallow clone.
So there will be two Hashes, but the values will still share the same
scalar container.
If you add a new key it won't be in the other Hash.
my $a = { a => 1 };
my $b = $a.clone;
$b =
Hi,
I was wandering if the following is an assignment or a binding (or
binding of the entries);
my Hash $sleep-wait = { :s1(4.3), :s2(2.1), :s3(5.3), :s4(10.4), :s5(8.7),};
my Hash $sleep-left = $sleep-wait;
I noticed that in the following piece of code the $sleep-wait hash
entries were s
