Re: get__keyed_int

2003-07-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Juergen Boemmels wrote: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Is there any compelling reason that *_keyed_int vtables like: PMC* get_pmc_keyed_int (INTVAL* key) take a pointer to the key? Just passing the integer key would be shorter and faster. This is a good idea, and I support it. (As I

Re: get__keyed_int

2003-07-07 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I alread did ask some time ago: I looked up the original thread: (date 13.02.03) http://groups.google.de/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&th=53f5dbdd508603fb&rnum=1 > Is there any compelling reason that *_keyed_int vtables like: > > PMC* get_pmc_keyed_int

get__keyed_int

2003-07-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
I alread did ask some time ago: Is there any compelling reason that *_keyed_int vtables like: PMC* get_pmc_keyed_int (INTVAL* key) take a pointer to the key? This needs then (in all ops files, incl JIT): INTVAL key = $3; $1 = $2->vtable->get_pmc_keyed_int(interpreter, $2, &key); (setting up