Juergen Boemmels wrote:
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there any compelling reason that *_keyed_int vtables like:
PMC* get_pmc_keyed_int (INTVAL* key)
take a pointer to the key?
Just passing the integer key would be shorter and faster.
This is a good idea, and I support it. (As I
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I alread did ask some time ago:
I looked up the original thread: (date 13.02.03)
http://groups.google.de/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&th=53f5dbdd508603fb&rnum=1
> Is there any compelling reason that *_keyed_int vtables like:
>
> PMC* get_pmc_keyed_int
I alread did ask some time ago:
Is there any compelling reason that *_keyed_int vtables like:
PMC* get_pmc_keyed_int (INTVAL* key)
take a pointer to the key?
This needs then (in all ops files, incl JIT):
INTVAL key = $3;
$1 = $2->vtable->get_pmc_keyed_int(interpreter, $2, &key);
(setting up