From: "Reini Urban" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:04:44 +0200
>> Reini Urban wrote:
>>>
>>> I hope you know that this #+() syntax is the only existing syntax.
>>> It is widely used since about 20 years.
>>> The rest is something new we came up with.
As the tok
Reini Urban wrote:
And I'm tempted to add: Actually even the 1984 version of lisps are
still technically and syntax-wise far advanced over the perl and
parrot state of today. I see not much of a progress.
Philosophically, I agree. In my usual Parrot architecture talk there's a
slide right at
2008/8/29 chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Friday 29 August 2008 10:04:44 Reini Urban wrote:
>> perl5 even lost undump around that time and the perl compiler was axed last
>> year.
>
> Economic realities often trump idealism. I'd like to see a working Perl 5
> compiler suite as well, but I don'
On Friday 29 August 2008 10:04:44 Reini Urban wrote:
> perl5 even lost undump around that time and the perl compiler was axed last
> year.
Economic realities often trump idealism. I'd like to see a working Perl 5
compiler suite as well, but I don't have the time to do it, and no one seems
to
2008/8/29 Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Reini Urban wrote:
>>>
>>> I hope you know that this #+() syntax is the only existing syntax.
>>> It is widely used since about 20 years.
>>> The rest is something new we came
