Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: failures under Devel::Cover only

2005-01-21 Thread James E Keenan
Leif Eriksen wrote: Ah, OK, I know I was guilty of doing this (until recently) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (of couse $#$arrref is correct). Used to give me "Bizzare copy of array at ..." but only under "perl -d script.pl" (or perl -d:ptkdb script.pl when its available to me) . I'll checkit out, ther

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: failures under Devel::Cover only

2005-01-20 Thread leif . eriksen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leif Eriksen wrote: Hi, I am doing some testing under Devel::Cover, and get some weird results sometimes. What should I be looking at in my code or test cases that is provoking this discrepancy? Look for code that sneaks past perl under normal circumstances but not

Re: failures under Devel::Cover only

2005-01-20 Thread James E Keenan
Leif Eriksen wrote: Hi, I am doing some testing under Devel::Cover, and get some weird results sometimes. What should I be looking at in my code or test cases that is provoking this discrepancy? Without D::C ++ [snip] All tests successful. Files=13, Tes

Re: failures under Devel::Cover only

2005-01-20 Thread James E Keenan
Leif Eriksen wrote: Hi, I am doing some testing under Devel::Cover, and get some weird results sometimes. What should I be looking at in my code or test cases that is provoking this discrepancy? Here's a link to the posting I did on Devel::Cover several months back to which I referred a few

failures under Devel::Cover only

2005-01-19 Thread leif . eriksen
Hi, I am doing some testing under Devel::Cover, and get some weird results sometimes. What should I be looking at in my code or test cases that is provoking this discrepancy? Without D::C ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]$ make test ... PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/b