Leopold Toetsch wrote:
We already have a C opcode. I've now included the
functionality of C inside C.
Please use this code now instead of C:
.include "except_severity.pasm"
die_hard .EXCEPT_DOOMED, 0# die
die_hard .EXCEPT_DOOMED, 77 # die 77
The C opcode is doomed and will die.
Or due
We already have a C opcode. I've now included the
functionality of C inside C.
Please use this code now instead of C:
.include "except_severity.pasm"
die_hard .EXCEPT_DOOMED, 0# die
die_hard .EXCEPT_DOOMED, 77 # die 77
The C opcode is doomed and will die.
Thanks,
leo
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 22:16, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> We still need to consider what's an opcode and what not. We are going to
> blow reasonable code size soon.
Yes. Thats why I've added them to experimental.ops and not to math.ops
I'll add a note that it contains ops fo
