On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> At 15:02 -1000 2000.08.19, Tim Jenness wrote:
> >I'm of the camp that feels perl should have a fixed epoch rather than the
> >epoch of the underlining OS. Furthermore, I can understand that the OS
> >epoch can also be important when looking outside of pe
At 15:02 -1000 2000.08.19, Tim Jenness wrote:
>I'm of the camp that feels perl should have a fixed epoch rather than the
>epoch of the underlining OS. Furthermore, I can understand that the OS
>epoch can also be important when looking outside of perl. Thinking this
>over for a while it occurred to
I'm of the camp that feels perl should have a fixed epoch rather than the
epoch of the underlining OS. Furthermore, I can understand that the OS
epoch can also be important when looking outside of perl. Thinking this
over for a while it occurred to me that time() currently has no arguments
and th
