On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 07:12:06PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> PS - sbk30, please don't send me any more automated followup messages. Fix
> your mailing software.
I've found that our resident neighbourhood BOFHs have been very helpful at
forcibly un-subscribing anyone anti-social enough to be se
On Monday 14 August 2006 18:53, jerry gay wrote:
> moving todo() info out of these test files leads to fragile
> test harnesses, as adding a test to the middle of a file will change test
> numbers. if test descriptions are used, then unique descriptions for each
> test are required. et cetera.
Su
On 8/14/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ugh, so this means editing the canonical test repository for every
status-changing update to every implementation? Yuck. This seems like a
problem for implementation-specific harnesses and reporting tools.
this is what prompted me to start th
On Monday 14 August 2006 17:20, jerry gay wrote:
> > I've added the plan for the neutral todo mechanism to Pugs' TASKS
> > file, getting help from many others on #perl6. The new todo marks look
> > like this:
> >
> >todo :pugs<6.28.0>, :p6p5<0.110>, :parrot<1.00>;
> >is $got, $expected; #
[parrot-porters and p6l have been removed from this thread, as discussion of
testing tools is not directly related to those lists]
On 8/11/06, Agent Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/12/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this last testing rule i mentioned becomes somewhat problematic
