Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry about that - I converted the test from an existing one for
> ResizableFloatArray, but forgot that in the string case there's a
> much higher load on the GC system due to all the string headers.
Actually the problem aren't the string headers per s
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:13:53PM -, Simon Glover wrote:
>
> > +output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', 'pop many values');
> > + new P0, .ResizableStringArray
> > + set I0, 0
> > +L1: set S0, I0
> > + set P0[I0], S0
> > + inc
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:13:53PM -, Simon Glover wrote:
>> + lt I0, 10, L1
> ^this^
> really really hurts.
It's already reduced in CVS.
> Nicholas Clark
leo
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:13:53PM -, Simon Glover wrote:
> +output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', 'pop many values');
> + new P0, .ResizableStringArray
> + set I0, 0
> +L1: set S0, I0
> + set P0[I0], S0
> + inc I0
> + lt I0, 10, L1
^this^
re
